Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
02 04 16 • KG LU 02 04 16 AI generated

Appeal on Child Support Binding Status and Provisional Spousal Contribution Awards

Case Number 02 04 16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

In an appeal concerning divorce ancillary matters, the court held that if spousal support remains contested, the child support amounts fixed in the lower court's initial judgment are not binding on the appellate court, even if that part was not appealed, because child support and spousal support together form a whole impacting the obligated party's capacity. Furthermore, the court ruled that claims for contributions toward building an adequate retirement provision cannot typically be granted in provisional measures proceedings, as such complex assessments belong to the final divorce judgment under relevant provisions concerning spousal support and asset division.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8, 137 Abs. 2 , und 148 Abs. 1 ZGB. Bleibt vor Obergericht der Ehegattenunterhalt streitig, so sind die im Amtsgerichtsurteil festgesetzten Kinderunterhaltsbeiträge auch für den Massnahmerichter im Appellationsverfahren nicht verbindlich, selbst wenn dagegen nicht appelliert wurde. Unterhaltsbeiträge für den Aufbau einer angemessenen Altersvorsorge können regelmässig nicht im vorsorglichen Massnahmeverfahren zugesprochen werden, sondern sind Gegenstand des Scheidungsurteils. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
provisional child support divorce proceedings provisional measures claim for contributions retirement duration of spousal support

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 145 aZGB
Art. 137 ZGB
Art. 148 Abs. 1 ZGB
This provision was cited in the reasoning to explain why the child support amounts from the lower court decision did not attain final legal force because the spousal support was appealed.
Art. 163 ZGB
Art. 125 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 125 Abs.
Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB
This provision governs the necessary scope of provisional measures, which the court used to deny the claim for pre-emptive retirement provision payments.
Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8 ZGB
This provision, concerning post-divorce maintenance, is cited as the proper forum for assessing the adequacy of the applicant's retirement provision, justifying the denial in the provisional measures procedure.
Art. 122 ZGB

Cited Case Law

AI generated
5P.341/2002
Wife's Appeal Against Spousal Maintenance Calculation Dismissed on Grounds of Income Assessment and Surplus Income Allocation
AI generated
OG 1992 25
Child Support Finality Dependent on Spousal Support Review
22 09 102
Appeal on Modification of Spousal and Child Support Due to Changed Financial Circumstances
22 99 123
Spousal Support Calculation and Consideration of Inherited Assets
02 01 12
Modification of Provisional Support Following Final Divorce Decree
22 03 126
Modification of Support Due to Disability and Uncertain Future Income

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB

This provision governs the necessary scope of provisional measures, which the court used to deny the claim for pre-emptive retirement provision payments.

Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8 ZGB

This provision, concerning post-divorce maintenance, is cited as the proper forum for assessing the adequacy of the applicant's retirement provision, justifying the denial in the provisional measures procedure.

Art. 148 Abs. 1 ZGB

This provision was cited in the reasoning to explain why the child support amounts from the lower court decision did not attain final legal force because the spousal support was appealed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 07.12.2004

Fallnummer: · 02 04 16

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 4

Leitsatz: · Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8, 137 Abs. 2 , und 148 Abs. 1 ZGB. Bleibt vor Obergericht der Ehegattenunterhalt streitig, so sind die im Amtsgerichtsurteil festgesetzten Kinderunterhaltsbeiträge auch für den Massnahmerichter im Appellationsverfahren nicht verbindlich, selbst wenn dagegen nicht appelliert wurde. Unterhaltsbeiträge für den Aufbau einer angemessenen Altersvorsorge können regelmässig nicht im vorsorglichen Massnahmeverfahren zugesprochen werden, sondern sind Gegenstand des Scheidungsurteils.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.