Legislator Case Law & Legislation
01 06 10 • KG LU 01 06 10 AI generated

Trademark Infringement: Disclosure of Supplier Information for Counterfeit Goods

Case Number 01 06 10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a preliminary injunction proceeding concerning trademark infringement through the sale of counterfeit clothing, the court granted the applicant's request for the disclosure of the supplier information. The court reasoned that the catalogue of provisional measures under the relevant law is not exhaustive, but any measure must be appropriate to the specific case and reasonably proportional to preventing the impending disadvantage. Despite the respondent's claim that identifying the supplier was impossible because the goods were unsorted "job lot" items from Turkey, the court found the request for information reasonable and proportionate, given the respondent's statutory accounting obligations, which imply the possession of records such as offers, delivery notes, and invoices necessary to identify the source of the infringing goods.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 59 Abs. 2 MSchG. Die Aufzählung der vorsorglichen Massnahmen ist nicht abschliessend. Die Massnahme muss jedoch dem Einzelfall angemessen sein und in einem vernünftigen Verhältnis zur Verhinderung des drohenden Nachteils stehen. | Markenschutz

Keywords

AI generated
counterfeiting of goods trademark infringement disclosure of information requests for information fraudulent concealment of defects source of information

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Präsident der I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Markenschutz

Entscheiddatum: · 16.08.2006

Fallnummer: · 01 06 10

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 22

Leitsatz: · Art. 59 Abs. 2 MSchG. Die Aufzählung der vorsorglichen Massnahmen ist nicht abschliessend. Die Massnahme muss jedoch dem Einzelfall angemessen sein und in einem vernünftigen Verhältnis zur Verhinderung des drohenden Nachteils stehen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.