Legislator Case Law & Legislation
01 04 9 2 • KG LU 01 04 9 2 AI generated

Intellectual Property Preliminary Injunction Jurisdiction in Switzerland

Case Number 01 04 9 2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a preliminary injunction proceeding concerning the unlawful use of intellectual property rights on a website accessible to the general public, the court determined that the place of performance, and thus the competent court for jurisdiction, is any location in Switzerland from which the website can be accessed. The court reasoned that since the allegedly infringing website could be retrieved in the canton of the forum, the local jurisdiction was established under the rules governing tort actions, specifically where the damaging act's effect occurred, and this was sufficient for the preliminary measure request, even if the respondent contested other aspects of the case.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 25 und 33 GestG. Werden fremde Immaterialgüterrechte rechtswidrig auf einer Website verwendet, so kann das Gesuch um vorsorgliche Massnahmen am Erfolgsort eingereicht werden. Steht die Website der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung, dann gilt als Erfolgsort jeder Ort in der Schweiz, von dem aus die Website abrufbar ist. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
intellectual property actions for damages geographic scope of the infringement established right determination of jurisdiction location of property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 33 GestG
Cited in the introductory text to establish the mandatory jurisdiction for issuing preliminary measures.
Art. 25 GestG
Cited in the introductory text as the rule governing jurisdiction for actions based on torts, including intellectual property infringements.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 33 GestG

Cited in the introductory text to establish the mandatory jurisdiction for issuing preliminary measures.

Art. 25 GestG

Cited in the introductory text as the rule governing jurisdiction for actions based on torts, including intellectual property infringements.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 08.07.2004

Fallnummer: · 01 04 9.2

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 35

Leitsatz: · Art. 25 und 33 GestG. Werden fremde Immaterialgüterrechte rechtswidrig auf einer Website verwendet, so kann das Gesuch um vorsorgliche Massnahmen am Erfolgsort eingereicht werden. Steht die Website der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung, dann gilt als Erfolgsort jeder Ort in der Schweiz, von dem aus die Website abrufbar ist.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.