Legislator Case Law & Legislation
01 03 9 • KG LU 01 03 9 AI generated

Unfair Competition Prospectus Distribution Address Request Denial

Case Number 01 03 9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a dispute concerning unfair competition, an applicant sought an interim measure to prohibit the distribution of a prospectus and requested the addresses of the recipients, claiming this was necessary to assess the scope of the alleged illegality and to rectify the content with the recipients beforehand. The court ruled that the purpose of a precautionary evidentiary measure under Article 14 of the Unfair Competition Act in conjunction with Article 28c(2)(2) of the Civil Code is to prevent loss of evidence due to time-related disadvantages, not to pre-litigationally correct the allegedly unlawful content of a prospectus with the addressees. Since the applicant failed to demonstrate the urgency of obtaining the addresses or that they would otherwise be destroyed, and since such an address request amounted to an inadmissible pre-litigation document production without a proven entitlement, the request for the addresses was denied.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 14 UWG; Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB. Zweck dieser Beweissicherungsmassnahme kann nicht sein, den angeblich rechtswidrigen Inhalt eines Prospekts bei dessen Adressaten vorprozessual richtig zu stellen. | UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)

Keywords

AI generated
unfair competition civil dispute production of documents interim distribution exclusion from procurement procedure unsuccessful tender procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 14 UWG

This provision is cited in the decision section describing the scope of the evidence preservation measure sought.

Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB

This provision is cited in the decision section describing the scope of the evidence preservation measure sought.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)

Entscheiddatum: · 12.02.2004

Fallnummer: · 01 03 9

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 31

Leitsatz: · Art. 14 UWG; Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB. Zweck dieser Beweissicherungsmassnahme kann nicht sein, den angeblich rechtswidrigen Inhalt eines Prospekts bei dessen Adressaten vorprozessual richtig zu stellen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.