Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
A/4667/2005 • TAPI GE A/4667/2005 AI generated

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence

Case Number A/4667/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Geneva (CH-GE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant contested a decision, arguing that the opposition filed by the opposing party was time-barred under Article 23, paragraph 2 of the relevant procedural law, and that the trial court erred by not admitting evidence to prove the late filing, despite this constituting a direct means of proof regarding the timeliness of the action. The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence: The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Keywords

AI generated
timeliness of filing late procedural objections appealability of remand decision time when evidence is produced new legal argument right to a decision
AI generated
A/1755/2007
Appellant v. Opponent on Timeliness and Standing of Opposition
C/4030/2013
Appellant v. Respondent on Timeliness of Claim and Evidentiary Rulings
C/20181/2019
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Seizure Opposition
P/16143/2024
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition to Penal Order Service
P/5370/2024
Appeal Regarding Admissibility of Timely Opposition Despite Postal Error

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A/4667/2005

### [DCRI/27/2008](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602232) du 28.01.2008 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; DÉLAI ; OPPOSITION(PROCÉDURE) ; MOYEN DE DROIT ; ADMINISTRATION DES PREUVES

Normes :

LISP. 23. al2

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2008/0000/DCRI_000027_2008_A_4667_2005.pdf)

* /