Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
745.19.70.290 • KG BL 745.19.70.290 AI generated

Supplementary Benefits Repayment Waiver Denied Due to Husband's Registered Address and Benefits Claim

Case Number 745.19.70.290
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Basel-Landschaft (CH-BL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court denied a request to waive the repayment of supplementary benefits because the recipient's estranged husband had been registered at her address for a period during which he also received supplementary benefits, despite being judicially separated. The court reasoned that the recipient could not have been unaware of her husband's presence and benefits claim, thus lacking the necessary good faith required for a waiver.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Supplementary Benefits Repayment Waiver Denied Due to Husband's Registered Address and Benefits Claim: The court reasoned that the recipient could not have been unaware of her husband's presence and benefits claim, thus lacking the necessary good faith required for a waiver.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary benefits recipient waiver of insurance benefits marital hardship claim repayment of unemployment benefits fraudulent obtaining of a benefit reapplication for disability benefits Erlass
AI generated
2019.11.19.sv.2
Supplementary Benefits Repayment Waiver Denied Due to Husband's Registered Address and Benefits Claim
2014.02.20.sv.2
Applicant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Spouse's Income Surplus
745.2013.153.49
Applicant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Spouse's Income Surplus
745.17.324.333
Claimant Fails to Prove Good Faith for EL Repayment Waiver

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht

vom 19. November 2019 (745 19 70 / 290) ____________________________________________________________________

Ergänzungsleistungen

Kein Erlass der Rückforderung, da es an der Voraussetzung der Gutgläubigkeit fehlt.

Besetzung Präsidentin Eva Meuli, Gerichtsschreiberin i.V. Ebru Eren

Parteien A.____, Beschwerdeführerin

gegen

Ausgleichskasse Basel-Landschaft, Hauptstrasse 109, 4102 Binningen, Beschwerdegegnerin

Beigeladener B.____

Betreff Erlass

A. Die 1960 geborene A.____ bezieht seit 2001 Ergänzungsleistungen (EL) zur Invalidenrente (IV-Rente). Ihr seit dem 18. September 2000 gerichtlich von ihr getrennt lebender Ehemann, B.____, meldete sich per 20. August 2018 zum Bezug von EL an, da ihm rückwirkend ab 1. Dezember 2011 eine IV-Rente zugesprochen worden war. Bei der Bearbeitung des Gesuchs stellte die Ausgleichskasse Basel-Landschaft (Ausgleichskasse) fest, dass der Ehemann im Zeitraum

1. Juli 2014 bis 30. September 2016 an der Adresse von A.____ gemeldet gewesen war. Die