Legislator Case Law & Legislation
U 374/04 AI generated

Withdrawal of Insurance Appeal Settled Without Costs

Case Number U 374/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involved an individual who filed an administrative complaint against a decision made by the administrative court of a canton regarding a dispute with the national accident insurance institution. Subsequently, the individual withdrew their complaint, which led the federal insurance tribunal to decide that the complaint was resolved by this withdrawal and thus removed from the court's records without imposing any court costs. The tribunal's decision was issued in November 2005.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b VwVG; Withdrawal of Insurance Appeal Settled Without Costs: Subsequently, the individual withdrew their complaint, which led the federal insurance tribunal to decide that the complaint was resolved by this withdrawal and thus removed from the court's records without imposing any court costs. The tribunal's decision was issued in November 2005.

Keywords

AI generated
accident insurance matter withdrawal of insurance benefits administrative costs reconsideration by insurer non-administrative dispute social insurance dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b VwVG

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, leading to the cancellation of the case from the register, which implies no court costs are levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eidgenössisches Versicherungsgericht

Tribunale federale delle assicurazioni

Tribunal federal d'assicuranzas

Sozialversicherungsabteilung

des Bundesgerichts

Prozess

{T 0}

U 374/04

Entscheid vom 23. November 2005

II. Kammer

Besetzung

Präsident Borella, Bundesrichter Schön und Frésard; Gerichtsschreiber Krähenbühl

Parteien

G.________, 1944, Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Andreas Hebeisen, Löwenstrasse 12, 8280 Kreuzlingen,

gegen

Schweizerische Unfallversicherungsanstalt (SUVA), Fluhmattstrasse 1, 6004 Luzern, Beschwerdegegnerin

Vorinstanz

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Thurgau, Weinfelden

(Entscheid vom 18. August 2004)

Nachdem der Beschwerdeführer die Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde vom 18. Oktober 2004 gegen den Entscheid des Verwaltungsgerichts des Kantons Thurgau vom 18. August 2004 mit Schreiben vom 18. November 2005 zurückgezogen hat,

beschliesst das Eidg. Versicherungsgericht:

1. Die Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde wird als durch Rückzug erledigt vom Geschäftsverzeichnis abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Dieser Entscheid wird den Parteien, dem Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Thurgau und dem Bundesamt für Gesundheit zugestellt.

Luzern, 23. November 2005

Im Namen des Eidgenössischen Versicherungsgerichts

Der Präsident der II. Kammer: Der Gerichtsschreiber: