Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9C_844/2014 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding AHV/IV Supplementary Benefits

Case Number 9C_844/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves an appeal concerning supplementary benefits to the Old Age and Survivors Insurance/Disability Insurance, following a decision made by the social insurance court of a Swiss canton. The appeal was initiated by an individual against a decision from July 2014 but was subsequently withdrawn in February 2015 before the federal court. Consequently, the court has decided to dismiss the case based on the withdrawal of the appeal, and no court fees will be charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding AHV/IV Supplementary Benefits: The appeal was initiated by an individual against a decision from July 2014 but was subsequently withdrawn in February 2015 before the federal court. Consequently, the court has decided to dismiss the case based on the withdrawal of the appeal, and no court fees will be charged.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary ahv benefits article of civil procedure rules of procedure withdrawal of petition withdrawal of insurance benefits decisions on medical matters

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 71 BGG
Used in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP and Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Used in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG and Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Used in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG and Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Used to rule that no court fees shall be charged following the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
8C_75/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary AHV/IV Benefits
9C_47/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary AHV/IV Benefits
8C_665/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV
9C_81/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV
9C_854/2014
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary AHV/IV Benefits

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Used in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG and Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Used to rule that no court fees shall be charged following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 71 BGG

Used in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP and Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Used in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG and Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG to rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

2014.07.03.sv.3 (2014-07-03) · bl
Supplementary Benefits Denial Upheld: Deemed Disposal of Assets for Property Transfer
«…ausgerichtet. Gegen diesen Entscheid wurde vom Beschwerdeführer am 20. November 2014 Beschwerde beim Bundesgericht (9C_844/2014) erhoben. http://www.bl.ch/kantonsgericht Seite 7…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_844/2014

Verfügung vom 10. Februar 2015

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Meyer, als Einzelrichter,

Gerichtsschreiberin Bollinger Hammerle.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________,

vertreten durch Advokatin Elisabeth Joller,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

Ausgleichskasse Basel-Landschaft, Hauptstrasse 109, 4102 Binningen,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Ergänzungsleistung zur AHV/IV,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, vom 3. Juli 2014.

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 9. Februar 2015, worin A.________ die Beschwerde vom 20. November 2014 (Poststempel) gegen den Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, vom 3. Juli 2014 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten verzichtet wird,

verfügt der Einzelrichter:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Kantonsgericht Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 10. Februar 2015

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Einzelrichter: Meyer

Die Gerichtsschreiberin: Bollinger Hammerle