Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9C_738/2019 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn in Health Insurance Dispute

Case Number 9C_738/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

In this case, an individual, represented by a legal protection insurance company, lodged an appeal against a decision by the Cantonal Court of the Republic and Canton of Neuchâtel, Public Law Division, regarding a health insurance dispute. The appeal was initially filed on October 31, 2019, but was subsequently withdrawn by the appellant on December 6, 2019. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, presided over by a single judge from the Second Social Law Court, decided to remove the case from its docket without imposing any court costs. The decision was communicated to all parties involved, including the Cantonal Court and the Federal Office of Public Health.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF; Appeal Withdrawn in Health Insurance Dispute: The appeal was initially filed on October 31, 2019, but was subsequently withdrawn by the appellant on December 6, 2019. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, presided over by a single judge from the Second Social Law Court, decided to remove the case from its docket without imposing any court costs. The decision was communicated to all parties involved, including the Cantonal Court and the Federal Office of Public Health.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute health insurance costs withdrawal of insurance benefits decisions on medical matters withdrawal of petition subrogation of insurer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 and 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited as the justification for ruling without court fees.
art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PCF as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
9C_1006/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal in Health Insurance Dispute
9C_516/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal in Health Insurance Case
9C_3/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal in Health Insurance Matter
9C_1052/2010
Withdrawal of Health Insurance Appeal
9C_132/2013
Case Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Appeal in Health Insurance Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PCF as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited as the justification for ruling without court fees.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 and 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (2)

9C_749/2019 (2020-02-21)
«…ticipation légale (correspondance du 6 décembre 2019). En conséquence, la Cour de céans a radié la cause du rôle (arrêt 9C_738/2019 du 18 décembre 2019). L'OFSP a déclaré maintenir son recours. Considérant en droit : 1. Le Tribunal fédéral examine d'o…»
608 2019 84 (2019-09-25) · fr
Successive Disability Schemes and Temporal Causation of Incapacity
«…rindemnisation. E. Le recours déposé le 24 octobre 2018 par B.________ a été admis par le Tribunal fédéral (arrêt 9C_738/2019 du 7 mars 2019). En substance, ce dernier a considéré que, dès lors que la première décision rendue par l'OAI n'avait p…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_738/2019

Ordonnance du 18 décembre 2019

IIe Cour de droit social

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière : Mme Perrenoud.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée CAP Compagnie d'Assurance de

Protection Juridique SA,

recourante,

contre

Assura-Basis SA,

En Budron A1, 1052 Le Mont-sur-Lausanne,

intimée.

Objet

Assurance-maladie,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, du 2 octobre 2019 (CDP.2019.110-AMAL/amp).

Vu :

la lettre du 6 décembre 2019 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 31 octobre 2019 (timbre postal) contre un jugement du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, du 2 octobre 2019,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie en appliquant l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, et à l'Office fédéral de la santé publique.

Lucerne, le 18 décembre 2019

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

La Greffière : Perrenoud