Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9C_490/2013 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal in OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits Case

Case Number 9C_490/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involved an individual appealing a decision related to supplementary benefits for old-age and disability insurance. The appeal was directed against a ruling made by the Superior Court of the Canton of Schaffhausen on May 31, 2013. However, prior to the decision by the Federal Court, the individual withdrew the appeal on August 5, 2013. Consequently, the Federal Court processed the case as withdrawn and determined that no court costs would be incurred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Appeal Withdrawal in OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits Case: The appeal was directed against a ruling made by the Superior Court of the Canton of Schaffhausen on May 31, 2013. However, prior to the decision by the Federal Court, the individual withdrew the appeal on August 5, 2013. Consequently, the Federal Court processed the case as withdrawn and determined that no court costs would be incurred.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary benefits withdrawal of social benefits discontinuation of proceedings deemed withdrawal standing to appeal withdrawal of legal petition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited as part of the procedure according to which the appeal is to be struck off.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Applied to waive the collection of court costs.
AI generated
9C_380/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
9C_536/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
I 912/06
Withdrawal of Appeal Against OASI/DI Decision
9C_864/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Benefits Case
8C_160/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal and Dismissal of Proceedings in Supplementary Benefits Case

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited as part of the procedure according to which the appeal is to be struck off.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Applied to waive the collection of court costs.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

63/2012/61 (2021-02-03) · sh
Supplementary Benefits Calculation for Disability Insurance Recipients
«…ichrechtlichen Angelegenheiten ans Bundesgericht gegen diesen Entscheid wurde am 5. August 2013 zurückgezogen (BGer 9C_490/2013 vom 8. August 2013). 2 Bundesgesetz über Ergänzungsleistungen zur Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invaliden- v…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_490/2013

Verfügung vom 8. August 2013

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Kernen, Präsident,

Gerichtsschreiber Fessler.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

D.________,

vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Lorentz, substituiert durch Rechtsanwalt Thomas Wyss,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

Sozialversicherungsamt Schaffhausen,

AHV-Ausgleichskasse,

Oberstadt 9, 8200 Schaffhausen,

Beschwerdegegner.

Gegenstand

Ergänzungsleistung zur AHV/IV,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid

des Obergerichts des Kantons Schaffhausen

vom 31. Mai 2013.

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 5. August 2013, worin D.________ die Beschwerde vom 3. Juli 2013 gegen den Entscheid des Obergerichts des Kantons Schaffhausen vom 31. Mai 2013 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten zu verzichten ist,

verfügt der Präsident:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Obergericht des Kantons Schaffhausen und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 8. August 2013

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Präsident: Kernen

Der Gerichtsschreiber: Fessler