Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9C_355/2021 AI generated

Discontinuance of Appeal in Bern Disability Insurance Case Following Withdrawal

Case Number 9C_355/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An individual, represented by an attorney, lodged a complaint against a decision made by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern concerning invalidity insurance. However, on October 22, 2021, the individual decided to withdraw their appeal, which was initially filed on June 17, 2021, against the court's decision from May 10, 2021. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, handling the case within its jurisdiction over social security matters, acknowledged the withdrawal and determined that no court costs would be charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Discontinuance of Appeal in Bern Disability Insurance Case Following Withdrawal: However, on October 22, 2021, the individual decided to withdraw their appeal, which was initially filed on June 17, 2021, against the court's decision from May 10, 2021. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, handling the case within its jurisdiction over social security matters, acknowledged the withdrawal and determined that no court costs would be charged.

Keywords

AI generated
disability insurance withdrawal of administrative act withdrawal of insurance benefits article of civil procedure social insurance proceedings administrative complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for dismissing the appeal following its withdrawal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for dismissing the appeal following its withdrawal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited as regulating the simplified procedure under which the appeal was dismissed.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Used to rule that no court fees shall be levied.
AI generated
9C_531/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal in Disability Insurance Case
8C_401/2017
Voluntary Withdrawal of Disability Insurance Appeal
9C_281/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal in Disability Insurance Case
9C_257/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal in Disability Insurance Case Following Legal Aid Denial
9C_523/2007
Withdrawal of Disability Insurance Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited as regulating the simplified procedure under which the appeal was dismissed.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Used to rule that no court fees shall be levied.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for dismissing the appeal following its withdrawal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for dismissing the appeal following its withdrawal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

200 2022 449 (2022-08-09) · be
Disability Benefits Revision Denied Due to Untimely and Inadmissible New Evidence
«…ene Beschwerde zog der Gesuch- steller zurück (vgl. Prozessentscheid des Bundesgerichts vom 26. Ok- tober 2021, 9C_355/2021).  Mit Eingabe vom 5. August 2022 ersucht der Gesuchsteller, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, um Revisi…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_355/2021

Verfügung vom 26. Oktober 2021

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichterin Moser-Szeless, als Einzelrichterin,

Gerichtsschreiberin Nünlist.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________,

vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Matthias Frey,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

IV-Stelle Bern, Scheibenstrasse 70, 3014 Bern,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Invalidenversicherung,

Beschwerde gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts des Kantons Bern vom 10. Mai 2021 (200 20 845 IV).

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 22. Oktober 2021, worin A.________ die Beschwerde vom 17. Juni 2021 (Poststempel) gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts des Kantons Bern vom 10. Mai 2021 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten verzichtet wird,

verfügt die Einzelrichterin:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Bern und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 26. Oktober 2021

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Die Einzelrichterin: Moser-Szeless

Die Gerichtsschreiberin: Nünlist