Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
8C_471/2015 AI generated

Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawn and Case Struck from Docket

Case Number 8C_471/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves a dispute related to unemployment insurance, where a cantonal unemployment insurance fund withdrew its appeal against a judgment made by the Neuchâtel Cantonal Court on May 29, 2015. The withdrawal was officially communicated on March 17, 2016. As a result of the withdrawal, the Federal Tribunal decided to remove the case from its docket and mandated that no judicial fees be charged, while also awarding a sum for costs to the opposing party, considering that similar claims were raised in related parallel proceedings involving the same legal representation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawn and Case Struck from Docket: The withdrawal was officially communicated on March 17, 2016. As a result of the withdrawal, the Federal Tribunal decided to remove the case from its docket and mandated that no judicial fees be charged, while also awarding a sum for costs to the opposing party, considering that similar claims were raised in related parallel proceedings involving the same legal representation.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment insurance unemployment termination of insurance benefits strike social insurance dispute insurance fund

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited as the relevant procedural rule regarding the striking off the roll due to withdrawal in this specific context.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Applied to order that no judicial costs shall be levied.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
Applied to order that the respondent be awarded costs for its submissions before the Federal Tribunal.
Art. 68 al. 1 LTF
Applied to determine the amount of costs awarded to the respondent.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other articles to order that the case be struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other articles to order that the case be struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
8C_507/2021
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal
8C_602/2008
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal
8C_707/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal in Unemployment Insurance Matter
8C_319/2011
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
8C_21/2009
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other articles to order that the case be struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Applied to order that no judicial costs shall be levied.

art. 68 al. 1 LTF

Applied to determine the amount of costs awarded to the respondent.

art. 68 al. 2 LTF

Applied to order that the respondent be awarded costs for its submissions before the Federal Tribunal.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other articles to order that the case be struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited as the relevant procedural rule regarding the striking off the roll due to withdrawal in this specific context.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (2)

8C_469/2015 (2016-02-26)
«…ublic contre les arrêts cantonaux concernant les cinq autres anciens travailleurs de B.________ SA (causes 8C_470/2015, 8C_471/2015, 8C_472/2015, 8C_473/2015 et 8C_474/2015). Elle demande au Tribunal fédéral de joindre les six causes et de statuer en…»
S1 13 106 (2014-05-13) · vs
Social Insurance Appeal Electronic Submission Validity
«…Mit Urteil vom 16. März 2015 (8C_471/2015) wies das Bundesgericht eine gegen vor- liegenden Entscheid gerichtete Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenhe…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

8C_471/2015

Ordonnance du 21 mars 2016

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière : Mme Castella.

Participants à la procédure

Caisse cantonale neuchâteloise d'assurance-chômage, avenue Léopold-Robert 11a, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds,

recourante,

contre

B.________,

représenté par Me Sandrine Chiavazza, avocate, place Pépinet 4, 1003 Lausanne,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-chômage (retrait du recours),

recours contre le jugement de la Cour de droit public

du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel du 29 mai 2015.

Vu :

la lettre du 17 mars 2016 par laquelle la Caisse cantonale neuchâteloise d'assurance-chômage a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 29 juin 2015 (timbre postal) contre un jugement de la Cour de droit public du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel du 29 mai 2015,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF (RS 273),

qu'il se justifie, en application de l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF , de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

qu'il y a lieu d'accorder des dépens à l'intimé pour ses déterminations conformément à l' art. 68 al. 2 LTF ,

qu'il convient d'en fixer le montant en tenant compte du fait que les griefs soulevés sont identiques dans des procédures parallèles où les parties intimées, représentées par la même avocate, ont également droit à des dépens ( art. 68 al. 1 LTF ),

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La recourante versera à l'intimé la somme de 700 fr. à titre de dépens pour la procédure devant le Tribunal fédéral.

4. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, à la Cour de droit public du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel et au Secrétariat d'Etat à l'économie (SECO).

Lucerne, le 21 mars 2016

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique : Frésard

La Greffière : Castella