Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7B.240/2005 AI generated

Federal Tribunal Declares Complaint Inadmissible Due to Unrepresented Guardian's Lack of Procedural Capacity

Case Number 7B.240/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves an individual who filed a complaint for denial of justice against a decision made by the cantonal court in the Valais region. The complaint was submitted to the Federal Tribunal but was declared inadmissible due to the failure to provide the necessary consent from the supervisory authority within the specified timeframe. The complaint was submitted under the guardianship of the individual, who was required to have the consent for legal proceedings. Ultimately, the complaint was deemed irreceivable as the required documentation was not submitted on time.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 421 ch. 8 CC; Federal Tribunal Declares Complaint Inadmissible Due to Unrepresented Guardian's Lack of Procedural Capacity: The complaint was submitted to the Federal Tribunal but was declared inadmissible due to the failure to provide the necessary consent from the supervisory authority within the specified timeframe. The complaint was submitted under the guardianship of the individual, who was required to have the consent for legal proceedings. Ultimately, the complaint was deemed irreceivable as the required documentation was not submitted on time.

Keywords

AI generated
guardianship supervisory complaint procedural capacity guardian failure to render assistance default of counsel

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 421 ch. 8 CC
The requirement for consent from the guardianship authority, which was not provided, led to the inadmissibility of the complaint.
AI generated
5A_62/2020
Guardian Dismissal Appeal Inadmissibility
5A_637/2021
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Lack of Legal Capacity and Guardian's Refusal to Ratify
4D_16/2020
Representation Defect in Federal Tribunal Appeal under Guardianship
5A_303/2022
Inadmissibility of Appeal Filed by Person with Limited Capacity Without Guardian Ratification
8C_583/2021
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Lack of Guardian Ratification in Guardianship Case

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 421 ch. 8 CC

The requirement for consent from the guardianship authority, which was not provided, led to the inadmissibility of the complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

PS.2012.0029 (2012-05-11) · vd
Guardian Consent for Inadmissible Administrative Appeal
«…de l’autorité tutélaire est également nécessaire dans ce cas (art. 367 al. 3 et 421 ch. 8 CC), sous la même peine (ATF 7B.240/2005 du 10 février 2006), - que le recourant n’a pas produit les autorisations requises, - qu’ainsi, à…»

Full text

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

7B.240/2005 /frs

Arrêt du 10 février 2006

Chambre des poursuites et des faillites

Composition

Mme et MM. les Juges Hohl, Présidente,

Meyer et Marazzi.

Greffier: M. Fellay.

Parties

X.________,

plaignant,

contre

Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais, Autorité de surveillance LP, Palais de Justice, 1950 Sion 2,

Objet

radiation d'une plainte,

plainte pour déni de justice contre la décision du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais, Autorité de surveillance LP, du 12 décembre 2005.

Vu:

la plainte pour déni de justice adressée au Tribunal fédéral le 17 décembre 2005 par X.________, sous tutelle mais agissant seul;

l'ordonnance présidentielle du 3 janvier 2006 invitant le plaignant à produire jusqu'au 25 janvier 2006 le consentement de l'autorité tutélaire requis par l' art. 421 ch. 8 CC , sous peine d'irrecevabilité de la plainte;

Considérant:

que le consentement de l'autorité tutélaire requis n'ayant pas été fourni dans le délai imparti, la plainte doit être déclarée irrecevable;

Par ces motifs, la Chambre prononce:

1. La plainte est irrecevable.

2. Le présent arrêt est communiqué en copie au plaignant, à son tuteur et au Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais, Autorité de surveillance LP.

Lausanne, le 10 février 2006

Au nom de la Chambre des poursuites et des faillites

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La présidente: Le greffier: