Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5A_696/2024 AI generated

Appeal Inadmissible Due to Non-Payment of Advance on Costs

Case Number 5A_696/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A petitioner filed a civil law appeal with the Swiss Federal Tribunal against a decision by the Upper Authority in Complaint Matters of the Cantonal Court of Valais dated September 27, 2024. The appeal involved a notice of seizure issued by the Office of Pursuits for the districts of Monthey and St-Maurice. The petitioner sought to challenge the decision through this legal avenue. Although a request for a suspensive effect was initially rejected, the petitioner was ordered to pay an advance cost of 1,500 Swiss Francs by October 25, 2024. Despite being given an additional deadline until November 11, 2024, to make the payment, the deadline was not met, resulting in the appeal being declared inadmissible due to non-payment of the required fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, art. 63 al. 2 LTF; Appeal Inadmissible Due to Non-Payment of Advance on Costs: The appeal involved a notice of seizure issued by the Office of Pursuits for the districts of Monthey and St-Maurice. The petitioner sought to challenge the decision through this legal avenue. Although a request for a suspensive effect was initially rejected, the petitioner was ordered to pay an advance cost of 1,500 Swiss Francs by October 25, 2024. Despite being given an additional deadline until November 11, 2024, to make the payment, the deadline was not met, resulting in the appeal being declared inadmissible due to non-payment of the required fees.

Keywords

AI generated
advance on court costs order to pay notice period late objection to debt enforcement judicial law order of seizure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
The appeal was declared inadmissible via simplified procedure because the required advance on costs was not paid.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Used to order the appellant to bear the judicial costs.
art. 63 al. 2 LTF
Cited alongside Art. 108 LTF in the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible due to non-payment of the advance on costs.
AI generated
5A_816/2018
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance
5A_326/2008
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Failure to Pay Cost Advance
6B_596/2010
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Non-Payment of Cost Advance
4A_160/2014
Appeal Inadmissible for Failure to Pay Advance on Costs
4A_515/2009
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Failure to Pay Cost Advance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal was declared inadmissible via simplified procedure because the required advance on costs was not paid.

art. 63 al. 2 LTF

Cited alongside Art. 108 LTF in the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible due to non-payment of the advance on costs.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used to order the appellant to bear the judicial costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

LP 24 25 (2024-09-27) · vs
Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification
«…bre 2024, la IIe cour de droit civil du Tribunal fédéral a déclaré irrecevable le recours déposé contre cette décision (5A_696/2024). LP 24 25 DÉCISION DU 27 SEPTEMBRE 2024 Autorité supérieure en mat…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

5A_696/2024

Arrêt du 25 novembre 2024

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Herrmann, Président.

Greffier : M. Braconi.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

recourant,

contre

Office des poursuites des districts de

Monthey et St-Maurice,

avenue de Crochetan 2, case postale 160, 1870 Monthey,

B.________,

représentée par Me Emilie Kalbermatter, avocate.

Objet

avis de saisie,

recours contre la décision de l'Autorité supérieure en matière de plainte du Tribunal cantonal du canton

du Valais du 27 septembre 2024 (LP 24 25).

Vu :

le recours en matière civile interjeté par A.________ à l'encontre de la décision rendue le 27 septembre 2024 par l'Autorité supérieure en matière de plainte du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais;

l'ordonnance du 10 octobre 2024 rejetant la requête d'effet suspensif du recourant;

l'ordonnance du même jour invitant le prénommé à verser une avance de frais de 1'500 fr. jusqu'au 25 octobre 2024;

l'ordonnance du 30 octobre 2024 - non réclamée - lui fixant un délai supplémentaire au 11 novembre 2024 pour payer l'avance requise;

l'attestation de la Caisse du Tribunal fédéral du 22 novembre 2024;

considérant :

que l'avance de frais n'a pas été fournie dans le délai supplémentaire imparti à cet effet;

que, partant, le présent recours doit être déclaré irrecevable par voie de procédure simplifiée ( art. 63 al. 2 et art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF );

que les frais judiciaires incombent au recourant ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, le Président prononce :

1. Le recours est irrecevable.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 300 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux participants à la procédure et à l'Autorité supérieure en matière de plainte du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais.

Lausanne, le 25 novembre 2024

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président : Herrmann

Le Greffier : Braconi