Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5A_330/2010 AI generated

Provisional Measures Withdrawal in Divorce Appeal: Cost Allocation

Case Number 5A_330/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves a divorce dispute where one party filed a civil appeal to the Federal Tribunal against a decision made by the District Court regarding provisional measures. The appeal was submitted after the District Court's ruling on March 26, 2010. Subsequently, the appeal was put on hold pending another nullity plea in the cantonal court, which ultimately accepted the plea on January 13, 2011, leading to the annulment of the contested judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings. On March 1, 2011, the appellant withdrew the appeal and requested a waiver of costs, resulting in the case being removed from the Tribunal's agenda. The court noted that since the appellant withdrew, they would bear the judicial costs, and no costs were awarded to either party as the other was not invited to respond to the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 66 al 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF; Provisional Measures Withdrawal in Divorce Appeal: Cost Allocation: The appeal was submitted after the District Court's ruling on March 26, 2010. Subsequently, the appeal was put on hold pending another nullity plea in the cantonal court, which ultimately accepted the plea on January 13, 2011, leading to the annulment of the contested judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings. On March 1, 2011, the appellant withdrew the appeal and requested a waiver of costs, resulting in the case being removed from the Tribunal's agenda. The court noted that since the appellant withdrew, they would bear the judicial costs, and no costs were awarded to either party as the other was not invited to respond to the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
provisional measures in divorce annulment proceedings allocation of costs civil judgment voluntary withdrawal related proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 73 PCF
Cited by reference (via art. 71 LTF) in the considerations to justify taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll, as confirmed in order 1.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited by reference in the considerations as the provision ensuring the application of procedural law (PCF) to the federal appeal.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the considerations regarding taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll.
Art. 66 al 1 LTF
Cited in order 2 as the basis for charging the judicial costs to the appellant due to withdrawal.
Art. 68 al. 1 LTF
Cited in order 3 as the basis for not awarding costs because the appellant ultimately failed.
AI generated
5A_485/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Provisional Measures Order in Divorce Case
5A_44/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Provisional Measures in Divorce Modification
5A_18/2010
Withdrawal of Divorce Decree Appeal and Cost Allocation
5A_363/2015
Withdrawal of Appeal and Cost Allocation in Matrimonial Protection Order Case
5A_437/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Provisional Maintenance Order

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the considerations regarding taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll.

art. 66 al 1 LTF

Cited in order 2 as the basis for charging the judicial costs to the appellant due to withdrawal.

art. 68 al. 1 LTF

Cited in order 3 as the basis for not awarding costs because the appellant ultimately failed.

art. 71 LTF

Cited by reference in the considerations as the provision ensuring the application of procedural law (PCF) to the federal appeal.

art. 73 PCF

Cited by reference (via art. 71 LTF) in the considerations to justify taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll, as confirmed in order 1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (3)

5A_635/2012 (2012-10-08)
«…rter les frais de procédure ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; ordonnances 5A_510/2010 du 24 juin 2011; 5A_330/2010 du 3 mars 2011); que l'émolument judiciaire incombe à la recourante ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF ); qu'il y a par ailleurs lieu…»
5A_865/2010 (2011-12-13)
«…rter les frais de procédure ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; ordonnances 5A_510/2010 du 24 juin 2011; 5A_330/2010 du 3 mars 2011); que les frais judiciaires incombent ainsi au recourant ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF ); que l'émolument judiciai…»
5A_838/2010 (2011-10-12)
«…énérale à la partie qui retire le recours de supporter les frais de procédure (ordonnances 5A_510/2010 du 24 juin 2011; 5A_330/2010 du 3 mars 2011); que les frais judiciaires incombent ainsi à la recourante ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF ); que l'émolument judic…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_330/2010

Ordonnance du 3 mars 2011

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffier: M. Fellay.

Participants à la procédure

A.________, (époux),

représenté par Me Laurent Maire, avocat,

recourant,

contre

dame A.________, (épouse),

représentée par Me Mireille Loroch, avocate,

intimée.

Objet

mesures provisionnelles (divorce),

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal d'arrondissement de La Côte du 26 mars 2010.

Vu:

le recours en matière civile adressé au Tribunal fédéral le 27 avril 2010;

l'ordonnance présidentielle du 29 avril 2010, suspendant l'instruction du recours en matière civile jusqu'à droit connu sur un recours en nullité déposé simultanément auprès de la Chambre des recours du Tribunal cantonal vaudois;

l'arrêt de cette autorité du 13 janvier 2011, admettant le recours cantonal, annulant le jugement attaqué et renvoyant la cause en première instance pour nouvelle instruction et nouvelle décision;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 1er mars 2011, assortie d'une demande de renonciation aux frais (art. 66 al. 1 in fine LTF) et d'allocation de dépens;

considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte du retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que du fait de son désistement, le recourant doit être considéré comme la partie qui succombe au sens de l'art. 66 al 1 LTF, de sorte qu'il doit assumer les frais judiciaires;

qu'il n'y a lieu d'allouer des dépens ni au recourant, qui succombe ( art. 68 al. 1 LTF ), ni à l'intimée, qui n'a pas été invitée à répondre au recours;

par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et la cause est rayée du rôle.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 500 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. Il n'est pas alloué de dépens.

4. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux participants à la procédure et au Tribunal d'arrondissement de La Côte.

Lausanne, le 3 mars 2011

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: Le Greffier:

Hohl Fellay