Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2C_840/2008 AI generated

Livestock Dealer License Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance

Case Number 2C_840/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Federal Supreme Court (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves an individual who contested the refusal to renew their livestock trading license by the veterinary service of a Swiss canton. They filed a public law appeal against a decision made by the administrative chamber of the cantonal court. However, the individual failed to pay the required court fee within the extended deadline, resulting in their appeal being declared inadmissible. Consequently, the court imposed the judicial costs on the appellant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 48 al. 4 LTF, Art. 62 al. 3 LTF, Art. 108 LTF, Art. 65 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 1ère phrase et al. 3 LTF; Livestock Dealer License Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance: They filed a public law appeal against a decision made by the administrative chamber of the cantonal court. However, the individual failed to pay the required court fee within the extended deadline, resulting in their appeal being declared inadmissible. Consequently, the court imposed the judicial costs on the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid cost advance order to pay judicial law late objection to debt enforcement licensee revocation of a licence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 48 al. 4 LTF
art. 48 al. 4 LTF ), si bien que son recours en matière de droit public doit être déclaré irrecevable, conformément à l' art.
Art. 62 al. 3 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to non-payment of the cost advance, which is reflected in order 1.
Art. 108 LTF
Cited as the procedural rule according to which the appeal will be decided, as reflected in the process described before the dispositive and order 1 (declaration of inadmissibility).
Art. 65 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as a rule influencing the decision on judicial costs charged to the appellant in order 2.
Art. 66 al. 1 1ère phrase et al. 3 LTF
Cited as the basis for charging the judicial costs to the appellant, as executed in order 2.
AI generated
5A_704/2008
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance
4D_79/2013
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance
2C_365/2007
Appeal Unadmissible Due to Unpaid Cost Advance
4A_30/2014
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Cost Advance
1C_901/2013
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unpaid Advance on Costs

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 108 LTF

Cited as the procedural rule according to which the appeal will be decided, as reflected in the process described before the dispositive and order 1 (declaration of inadmissibility).

Art. 62 al. 3 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to non-payment of the cost advance, which is reflected in order 1.

Art. 65 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as a rule influencing the decision on judicial costs charged to the appellant in order 2.

Art. 66 al. 1 1ère phrase et al. 3 LTF

Cited as the basis for charging the judicial costs to the appellant, as executed in order 2.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Subsequent Decisions Citing This Judgment (1)

2C_84/2009 (2009-02-24)
«…rtételle. Objet Patente de marchand de bétail; Demande en annulation de l'arrêt du Tribunal fédéral du 19 janvier 2009 (2C_840/2008). Faits: A. Par décision du 29 février 2008, le Service vétérinaire du Canton du jura a refusé de renouveler la patente…»

Full text

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

2C_840/2008

{T 0/2}

Arrêt du 19 janvier 2009

IIe Cour de droit public

Composition

M. le Juge Merkli, Juge présidant.

Greffière: Mme Charif Feller.

Parties

X.________, recourant,

représenté par Me Hubert Theurillat, avocat,

contre

Service vétérinaire du canton du Jura, Courtemelon, Case postale 65, 2852 Courtételle.

Objet

Patente de marchand de bétail; refus de renouvellement,

recours en matière de droit public contre l'arrêt de la Chambre administrative du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Jura, du 6 octobre 2008.

Considérant:

que, par ordonnance du 16 décembre 2008, le Président de la IIe Cour de droit public a prolongé - suite à une requête du recourant du 11 décembre 2008 - jusqu'au 5 janvier 2009 le délai initial courant jusqu'au 11 décembre 2008, imparti à celui-ci pour verser à la Caisse du Tribunal fédéral une avance de frais de 2'500 fr., l'attention du recourant ayant été attirée sur le fait que la prolongation accordée constituait un ultime délai et qu'à défaut de paiement dans ce second délai son recours serait déclaré irrecevable,

qu'à ce jour, le recourant n'a pas effectué l'avance de frais requise (cf. art. 48 al. 4 LTF ), si bien que son recours en matière de droit public doit être déclaré irrecevable, conformément à l' art. 62 al. 3 LTF , et traité selon la procédure simplifiée de l' art. 108 LTF ,

qu'il se justifie de mettre les fais judiciaires à la charge du recourant (cf. art. 66 al. 1 1 ère phrase et al. 3 LTF, art. 65 LTF ),

par ces motifs, le Juge présidant prononce:

1. Le recours est irrecevable.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 500 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. Le présent arrêt est communiqué au mandataire du recourant, au Service vétérinaire, à la Chambre administrative du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Jura et à l'Office vétérinaire fédéral.

Lausanne, le 19 janvier 2009

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge présidant: La Greffière:

Merkli Charif Feller