Legislator Case Law & Legislation
A 1-20 AI generated

Union's claim for invalid dismissal rejected; court found no evidence of unlawful termination procedures.

Case Number A 1-20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Labour Court dismissed the union's appeal against the termination of an employee by the employer and its subcontractor. The union argued that the dismissal violated collective agreement procedures and lacked sufficient justification, while the employer claimed the termination was lawful and necessary. The court rejected these arguments, finding no evidence that the employer failed to follow required steps or that the reasons for dismissal were invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1998:100; Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1998:101: A union's claim for invalid dismissal is dismissed when the employer demonstrates that the termination followed proper procedures and was based on valid reasons.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement termination procedures union appeal employer justification labour court
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Seko, Service- och kommunikationsfacket

mot

IT & Telekomföretagen och Transtema Network Services AB.

Målet gällde ogiltigförklaring av avskedande m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan avslogs.

Dom 2021-08-25, målnummer A-1-2020

Ledamöter: Cathrine Lilja Hansson, Claes-Göran Sundberg, Christer Måhl, Claes Frankhammar, Helena Linde, Jolan Wennberg och Anders Hammarbäck. Enhälligt.

Rättssekreterare: Leo Nilsson Nannini