Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2003.51 • TRPI TI 90.2003.51 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Mootness Following Withdrawal Consent

Case Number 90.2003.51
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A petitioner filed an appeal against a State Council decision that approved several amendments to the master plan of a former municipality. Subsequently, following a governmental resolution and communication from the municipality consenting to the withdrawal of the proceedings as moot, the court determined that the matter was concluded. Therefore, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the record and ruled that no fees or costs would be levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Mootness Following Withdrawal Consent: Subsequently, following a governmental resolution and communication from the municipality consenting to the withdrawal of the proceedings as moot, the court determined that the matter was concluded. Therefore, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the record and ruled that no fees or costs would be levied.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition transfer rendered moot appealable interlocutory decision administrative revocation of decision objection of unconstitutionality right of removal
AI generated
90.2000.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.2001.27
Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal
90.2000.83
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Regulatory Plan Challenge
52.2002.222
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.1994.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The dispositive orders the removal (stralcio) of the appeal from the roll because the procedure is exhausted.

2.

The dispositive orders that neither taxes nor costs be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2003.51 · Lugano 10 gennaio 2005 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 2 maggio 2003 del

RI 1 rappr. dal RA 1 contro

la decisione 11 febbraio 2003 (n. 619) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato alcune varianti del piano regolatore del già comune di __________;

preso atto che, a seguito della risoluzione governativa

9 dicembre 2003 (n. 5407), con scritto 28 settembre 2004 il municipio ha comunicato al tribunale ad acconsentire allo stralcio del procedimento, in quanto divenuto privo d'oggetto, dando seguito allo scritto di data 24 settembre 2004 del tribunale stesso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a:

terzi implicati · CO 1 rappr. da: RA 2 Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario