Art. 12C Commitments. — COMPETITION ACT
Art. 12C Commitments. · COMPETITION ACT
(1)
Instead of delivering a judgement finding an
infringement pursuant to article 13(1), the Court may issue a
judgement declaring commitments offered by the undertaking and, or
the association of undertakings concerned involved in a suspected
infringement to be binding on them, if the commitments are such as
to bring the suspected infringement to an end and where those
commitments meet the competition concerns expressed in that case
Provided that when delivering such judgement, the Court
shall not impose any penalty and shall not specify as to whether there
has been an infringement of articles 5, and, or 9 of the Act and, or
Articles 101 and, or 102 of the TFEU.
(2)
Commitments shall not be applicable where the suspected
infringement concerns secret cartels or any other agreements,
COMPETITION
decisions or concerted practices which involve price fixing, market
sharing or output limitation
Provided that in all other cases, the Court shall make a
case by case assessment, after taking into consideration all the
submissions of the parties to the proceedings, and any third party
comments as provided in sub-article (5) as to whether commitments
are the most appropriate measures to address the suspected
infringement in the case at issue.
(3) The judgement may specify that those commitments may
be adopted for a specific period of time and shall conclude that there
are no longer grounds for action that can be taken by the Director
General against the undertaking, and, or association of undertakings
concerned.
(4) Where the Court intends to deliver a judgement under
sub-article (1) and accepts the commitments proposed, it shall seek
the views of market participants by publishing a concise summary of
the case and the main contents of the commitments or of the
proposed course of action on the Gazette, having regard to the
legitimate interests of the undertakings as well as the protection of
business secrets or other confidential information
Provided that the Director General may request the
authorisation of the Court to seek the views of market participants or
of any other third parties by informing them directly regarding the
proposed commitments, which request shall also include the
authorization of the Court on the manner in which the said proposed
commitments are to be published and the time within which all views
of market participants or of any other third parties should be received
in the registry of the Court.
(5) Any interested party may submit their observations in the
records of the case within the time limit fixed by the Court in its
publication
Provided that the Director General and the undertaking
and, or association of undertakings concerned shall be notified and
given a copy of the third party comments.
(6) The Court shall reopen the proceedings upon a sworn
application by the Director General only where
(a) there has been a material change in any of the facts on
which the judgment was based; or
(b) the undertaking and, or association of undertakings
concerned acted contrary to its commitments; or
(c) the judgment was based on incomplete, incorrect, or
misleading information provided by the undertaking,
and, or association of undertakings concerned.
COMPETITION
(7) The Office shall have the powers to monitor the effective
implementation of the commitments referred to in sub-article (1) or
in article 17 and for this purpose, article 12 shall apply mutatis
mutandis.