175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 26b : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 26b
49 1 Die Vorinstanz und die am vorinstanzlichen Verfahren c. Schriften-
Beteiligten erhalten Gelegenheit zur schriftlichen Vernehmlassung. wechsel
Die Vorinstanz kann hierzu verpflichtet werden.
2 Die Vernehmlassungsfrist beträgt 30 Tage. In Stimmrechtssachen
beträgt die Frist fünf Tage. Wurde die Rekursfrist abgekürzt, ist die
Vernehmlassungsfrist entsprechend abzukürzen.59
3 Die Rekursinstanz kann einen weiteren Schriftenwechsel anord-
nen oder die Beteiligten zu einer mündlichen Verhandlung vorladen.
4 Die Rekursinstanz stellt die Vernehmlassungen den andern Ver-
fahrensbeteiligten zu.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)
VB.2024.00096 · zh (Art. 26b VRG)
Barn Conversion Permit Appeal and Procedural Violations in Cost Assessment
This provision relates to the cost and compensation consequences that the final decision partially set aside and remanded.
VB.2022.00135 · zh (§ 26b Abs. 2 VRG)
COVID-19 Hardship Fund Denial and Procedural Irregularities Appeal
This provision is listed among the cited legal norms relevant to the procedure followed in the case.
VB.2020.00441 · zh (Art. 26b Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing and Non-Appealable Internal Orders Regarding Visitation Restrictions
This provision relates to procedural aspects concerning the timeliness of the appeal filing.
VB.2019.00433 · zh (§ 26b Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Voting Rights Appeals Due to Missed Deadline and Procedural Fairness in School Construction Dispute
Although cited, this article was not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
VB.2018.00289 · zh (§ 26b Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Irreparable Harm
Cited regarding the extendability of procedural deadlines, although the decision was on non-admission.
VB.2017.00155 · zh (§ 26b Abs. 2 VRG)
Applicant v. Regulatory Body on Emergency Aid and Legal Aid
This provision is discussed concerning the possibility of shortening the response period for procedural motions, including requests for super-provisional measures or suspensive effect.
VR130007 · zh (§ 26b Abs. 3 VRG)
Interpreter Removed from Registry for Misconduct and Untrustworthiness
This provision relates to the possibility of holding an oral hearing, and the court's decision not to hold one is based on its interpretation of this provision.
BRGE.II.Nr.0067.201 · zh (Art. 26b Abs. 1 Satz 2 VRG)
Hydroelectric Plant Approval and Air Quality Mitigation in Protected Zone
This procedural provision was invoked by the court to order the Baudirektion to provide a statement regarding conflicting flow rate data.
VB.2011.00404 · zh (Art. 26b Abs. I VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Sentence Execution and Transfer Requests
This provision is mentioned as a relevant norm, likely regarding the scope of review or inadmissibility of certain requests.
VB.2011.00404 · zh (§ 26b Abs. I VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Sentence Execution and Transfer Requests
This provision likely relates to the inadmissibility/handling of non-substantive requests, as the decision addresses inadmissibility regarding requests beyond the scope of the case (E. 1.2-1.4).
VB.2011.00404 · zh (§ 26b Abs. III VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Sentence Execution and Transfer Requests
This provision likely relates to the handling or inadmissibility of supervisory law objections, as the decision addresses these objections (E. 1.2-1.4).
VB.2011.00124 · zh (§ 26b Abs. I VRG)
Housing Costs Calculation Dispute
Cited as a legal basis, likely related to procedural aspects within administrative law.
VB.2011.00124 · zh (§ 26b Abs. III VRG)
Housing Costs Calculation Dispute
Cited as a legal basis, likely related to procedural aspects within administrative law.
VB.2011.00124 · zh (§ 26b Abs. IV VRG)
Housing Costs Calculation Dispute
Cited as a legal basis, likely related to procedural aspects within administrative law.
VB190012 · zh (§ 58 i.V.m. § 26b VRG)
Appeal Regarding Access to Censored Statement Dismissed Due to Lack of Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the decision not to hold a sub-hearing, it provides the procedural basis for how the decision was reached concerning party instruction.