281.1
EGSCHKGLALP
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 27 Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (EGSchKG) - Rekursentscheid
Beschwerdebehörde und Beschwerde - Beschwerde
Art. 27 EGSchKG · Rekursentscheid
1. Die obere Behörde kann durch summarisch begründeten Entscheid auf einen offensichtlich unzulässigen Rekurs nicht eintreten oder einen offensichtlich unbegründeten Rekurs abweisen; gegebenenfalls kann sie auf die Begründung des angefochtenen Entscheids verweisen.
2. Gegenteiligenfalls untersucht und entscheidet sie gemäss den Bestimmungen dieses Kapitels.
3. Wenn sie den Rekurs gutheisst, kann sie den Handel der unteren Behörde zu neuem Entscheid im Sinne der Erwägungen zurückweisen oder selber urteilen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
LP 25 5 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Creditor's Appeal of Late Filing Deadline for Bankruptcy Estate Inclusion Dispute
Cited in the final order regarding the non-imposition of court fees and non-attribution of costs.
LP 24 27 · vs (Art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Appeal Regarding Public Auction Procedure for Partnership Share Liquidation
Cited in the dispositive regarding the non-levying of judicial costs and the non-allocation of legal costs.
LP 24 28 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Appellant v. Bankruptcy Office: Refusal to Reinstate Debt Liberation Action Post-Cession Lapse
Cited in the dispositive regarding costs and expenses (implicitly linked to Art. 25 al. 5).
LP 24 25 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification
Cited in the final order (No. 3) as the basis for not collecting judicial fees and not awarding costs.
LP 24 25 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification
Cited in the reasoning (section 15.3) as the basis for not collecting judicial fees and not awarding costs.
LP 24 25 · vs (art. 27 al. 3 in fine LALP)
Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification
Cited as the procedural basis for reforming the lower court's decision regarding the admissibility of the initial complaint.
LP 22 34 · vs (Art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Special Administrator Fees Reduction for Insufficient Detail in Bankruptcy Management
Cited in the dispositive order regarding the non-collection of judicial costs and non-allocation of legal costs.
LP 24 6 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Appeal Regarding Enforcement Against Jointly Owned Real Estate vs. Debtor's Partnership Share
Cited in the decision regarding the non-charging of judicial costs and non-allocation of legal costs for the appeal procedure.
LP 24 6 · vs (art. 27 al. 3 in fine LALP)
Appeal Regarding Enforcement Against Jointly Owned Real Estate vs. Debtor's Partnership Share
The contested decision is reformed based on this provision.
LP 23 38 · vs (art. 27 al. 2 LALP)
Seizure of Retroactive Social Benefits Reserved for Essential Future Medical Expenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the decision not to charge judicial fees and not to award costs.
LP 23 19 · vs (art. 27 al. 3 LALP)
Appeal Court Overturns Bankruptcy Revocation Due to Procedural Due Process Violation and Misclassification of Assignee Fees
The higher cantonal review authority declared the complaint inadmissible based on this provision.
LP 22 21 · vs (art. 27 al. 1 LALP)
Appeal Concerning Timeliness of Complaint Regarding Service of Payment Order at Alleged Domicile
Used as the procedural basis for rejecting the appeal without an exchange of briefs because it was manifestly ill-founded.
LP 13 58 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 i.V.m. Art. 27 Abs. 2 EGSchKG)
Debt Collection Seizure Appeal Dismissed for Defective Petition
Cited as the basis for not imposing costs or awarding party compensation in this specific appeal procedure.
LP 11 47 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 i.V.m. Art. 27 Abs. 2 EGSchKG)
Appeal Dismissed: Debt Enforcement Proceedings Challenges
Cited as a procedural basis for the costs (no costs and no party compensation).