270.1 EGZPOLACPC

CH-VS

Art. 5 Einführungsgesetz zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (EGZPO) - Kantonsgericht

Sachliche Zuständigkeit der mit den Zivilsachen be-auftragten Behörden

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (14 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 5 EGZPO · Kantonsgericht

1. Das Kantonsgericht beurteilt

a) als einzige kantonale Instanz in Zivilsachen aus Artikel 5, 7 oder 8 der Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung;

b) als Rechtsmittelinstanz für Berufungen und Beschwerden, die im 9. Titel der zweiten Teil der Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung vorgesehen sind.

2. In Angelegenheiten, die dem Kantonsgericht obliegen, ist ein einzelner Kantonsrichter zuständig

a) die in Artikel 5 Absatz 1 des vorliegenden Gesetzes vorgesehenen Angelegenheiten zu untersuchen;

b) über einen Antrag zu vorsorglichen Massnahmen oder zur Bewilligung einer vorzeitigen Vollstreckung zu entscheiden oder die Vollstreckbarkeit zu hemmen;

c) über die Berufung oder die Beschwerde zu entscheiden, wenn das vereinfachte oder summarische Verfahren erstinstanzlich anwendbar war; der bezeichnete Richter kann den Fall jedoch an einen Gerichtshof zuweisen.

3. Ausserdem entscheidet das Kantonsgericht in Schiedssachen in den in Artikel 356 Absatz 1 der Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung vorgesehenen Fällen.

← Art. 4 EGZPO Einführungsgesetz zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (EGZPO) - Ziel Art. 6 EGZPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (49)

TCVS C1 16 238 · vs (Art. 5 al. 1 let. b LACPC)

Insurer Reimbursement Claim in Plane Crash Case Rejected Despite Overcoming Prescription Period

Cited in the reasoning regarding appeal admissibility, but not in the dispositive orders.

C1 23 25 · vs (art. 5 al. 2 LACPC)

Appeal Concerning Scope of Out-of-Court Settlement on Assembly Work Claims

Used to establish that a single cantonal judge was competent to rule on the appeal because the simplified procedure applied in the first instance.

C1 24 12 · vs (Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. b EGZPO)

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Challenge Contractual Accountability and Substantiate Data Disclosure Claims

Cited in the background reasoning to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning the first instance decision.

C2 24 50 · vs (art. 5 al. 2 let. b LACPC)

Lessors' Request for Early Enforcement of Rent Decision Denied Amid Lessee's Appeal

This article establishes the jurisdictional competence of the single judge to rule on the request for early execution.

C3 23 47 · vs (Art. 5 Abs. 2 lit. c EGZPO i.V.m. Art. 20 Abs. 3 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 20 Abs. 1 Organisationsreglement der Walliser Gerichte)

Employee Vacation Pay and Kurzarbeit Wage Difference Appeal

Cited in the reasoning section to establish the jurisdiction of the single judge for the appeal, which is procedural background but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

C1 21 201 · vs (art. 5 al. 1 let. b LACPC)

Appeal Regarding Reimbursement of Ancillary Rental Costs Under Tenancy Law

Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal for the appeal in patrimonial matters.

C3 23 5 · vs (Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 lit. c EGZPO)

Municipality v. Company: Enforcement of Unpaid Visitor's Tax Following Annulment of Tax Regulation

Cited in connection with the competence of a single judge.

C1 22 288 · vs (Art. 5 al. 2 let. b et c LACPC par analogie)

Hague Convention Return Denied Due to Mature Child's Opposition to Allegedly Abusive Parent

Cited in the reasoning to justify the single-judge procedure.

C1 21 113 · vs (art. 5 al. 1 let. b LACPC)

Property Owner v. Co-Owners Regarding Wastewater Pipe Modification

Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal, but not in the final operative orders.

C1 21 113 · vs (art. 5 al. 2 let. c LACPC)

Property Owner v. Co-Owners Regarding Wastewater Pipe Modification

Cited in the reasoning regarding the composition of the court (single judge), but not in the final operative orders.

C1 22 27 · vs (art. 5 al. 2 let. c LACPC/VS)

Partial Claim Admissibility in Employment Dismissal Dispute

Used to determine the competent appellate judge (a single judge) for the admissible appeal point.

C1 20 284 · vs (art. 5 al. 1 let. b LACPC)

Insurance Coverage for Temporarily Stored Jewelry in Secondary Residence

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that an appeal was open based on the value in dispute.

C1 20 284 · vs (art. 5 al. 2 let. c LACPC)

Insurance Coverage for Temporarily Stored Jewelry in Secondary Residence

Cited in the reasoning concerning the competence of a single judge for the appeal, given the simplified procedure in the first instance.

C3 22 39 · vs (Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. b EGZPO)

Right of Way Claim Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Necessary Parties

Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the Cantonal Court as an appellate instance for complaints under Title 9 of the CPC.

C1 22 39 · vs (art. 5 al. 1 let. b LACPC)

Tenant Eviction Appeal Following Property Sale for Unpaid Rent

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the decision in question was subject to appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal.