Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 25 Gesetz betreffend den Tarif der Kosten und Entschädigungen vor Gerichts- oder Verwaltungsbehörden (GTar) - Beschwerdeverfahren

Kosten - Gebühren - Im öffentlichen Recht und Sozialversicherungsrecht
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (47 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 25 GTar · Beschwerdeverfahren

1. Für das Verfahren bei einer Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde wird eine Gebühr von 280 bis 5'000 Franken erhoben.

← Art. 24 GTar Gesetz betreffend den Tarif der Kosten und Entschädigungen vor Gerichts- oder Verwaltungsbehörden (GTar) - Anwendungsbereich Art. 26 GTar →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)

A1 25 8 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Hospital Authority v. State Council (Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Settled)
Cited to establish the range for the court fee in appeal proceedings before the Administrative Law Division.
F1 24 161 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Tax Liability Paid, Appeal Moot, Costs Assigned
Cited to specify the general range for the court fee in appeal proceedings before the tax division.
A1 23 163 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Municipality Tourist Tax Assessment Reinstated Pending Further Factual Review
Sets the general range for the court fee in administrative appeal proceedings.
A1 24 227 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Building Permit Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Cost Deposit
Cited to establish the range for the court fee applicable to appeal proceedings before the court.
A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the calculation of the court fee for appeal proceedings, which is linked to the cost order in the dispositive.
A1 24 72 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Weapons Confiscation Upheld Due to Psychiatric Risk Assessment
Cited to determine the range for setting the court fee in appeal proceedings.
A1 24 156 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Administrative Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal After Settlement
Cited in the reasoning regarding the typical range for court fees in appeal proceedings, supporting the fee amount.
F1 24 25 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Tax Objection Invalid Due to Missing Signature and Subsequent Agreement by Trustee
Used to determine the amount of the judicial fee for the appeal proceedings.
A1 23 134 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Appeal Against Building Permit Revocation Dismissed
Used to determine the amount of the court fee.
F1 24 110 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Tax Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Cost Deposit
Cited in the reasoning for establishing the range for court fees in appeal proceedings before the tax division.
A1 23 161 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Challenge to Public Contract Award for Road Monitoring Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning, and relevant to the fixed court cost amount of Fr. 2'500.00 imposed in the dispositive (Art. 2).
A1 23 148 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Branch Office Tax Liability and E-Mobility Subsidy Fraud
Used to determine the range for the court fee in appeal proceedings before the public law division of the Cantonal Court.
F1 24 70 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Tax Appeal Rendered Moot by Payment of Tax Liability
Used to state the general range for court fees in appeal procedures before the Tax Law Division.
F1 24 86 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Tax Appeal Dismissal for Failure to Pay Court Costs
Reference used to determine the general range for the court fee in appeal proceedings.
A1 23 36 · vs (Art. 25 GTar)
Teacher Termination Upheld Due to Permanent Incapacity
Cited in connection with the determination of the court fee amount in the final order.