172.6
VVRGLPJA
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 29 Gesetz über das Verwaltungsverfahren und die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VVRG) - Begründung und Eröffnung
Das Verfahren vor den Verwaltungsbehörden - Die Verfügung
Art. 29 VVRG · Begründung und Eröffnung
1. Die Behörde eröffnet die Verfügung den Parteien schriftlich. Die Verfügung ist diesfalls als solche zu bezeichnen, auch wenn sie in Briefform eröffnet wird.
2. Erfordert es die Natur der Sache, kann die Verfügung mündlich eröffnet werden. Sie ist schriftlich zu bestätigen, wenn der Betroffene, welcher über sein Recht bei der mündlichen Eröffnung informiert wurde, es innert fünf Tagen verlangt.
3. Die schriftliche Verfügung ist in tatsächlicher und rechtlicher Hinsicht zu begründen. Sie ist zu datieren und zu unterzeichnen. Sie hat eine Belehrung über das zulässige ordentliche Rechtsmittel mit Einschluss der Frist zu enthalten.
4. Die Rechtsmittelfrist läuft von der schriftlichen Eröffnung oder Bestätigung an.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
A3 24 20 · vs (art. 29 al. 3 LPJA)
Construction Company Fined for Unauthorised and Non-Compliant Retaining Walls
Cited in consideration 3.1 as part of the framework for the right to be heard, but not in the dispositive orders.
A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the duty to motivate decisions, relevant for the procedural validity of the lower decision which was ultimately upheld (dismissal).
A1 24 27 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Water Protection Zone Width Dispute
Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.2) as the cantonal legal basis for the duty to substantiate decisions.
A1 23 134 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Revocation Dismissed
Cited to address the argument concerning the duty to provide a reasoned decision, though ultimately finding the requirement met.
A1 22 162 · vs (Art. 29 al. 3 LPJA)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Social Assistance and Emergency Aid
Procedural article cited in the context of the formal complaint about the motivation, which the court implicitly rejected by partially upholding the decision.
A1 22 94 · vs (art. 29 al. 3 LPJA)
Group Residence Operating Ban Upheld Due to Severe Fire Safety Deficiencies
Cited when examining the appellant's complaint regarding the violation of the right to be heard (reasoned decision).
A1 22 104 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Decision Overturned for Failure to Address Key Objections in Structural Improvement Project
Cited as the cantonal basis for the obligation to state reasons for official acts, the violation of which led to the annulment.
A3 20 36 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Challenge to Administrative Order Regarding Water Intake Structure Fine and Removal
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.2) regarding the requirement for a legal advice notice in the written decision.
RVJ 2021 p 55 59 · vs (Art. 29 al. 3 LPJA)
Law Graduate Successfully Challenges Notary Exam Failure Due to Insufficient Justification of Low Score
Cited as the procedural law context for the requirement to motivate decisions, linked to the right to be heard.
A1 19 156 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Environmental Groups v. Canton on Wolf Cull Permit Validity
Mentioned in the reasoning concerning the duty to provide reasons, which supported the main ground for annulment (although not directly cited in the dispositive orders, it is cited alongside Art. 29 para. 2 BV in the context of assessing the validity of the prior decision's reasoning).
A1 19 44 · vs (Art. 29 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Administrative Appeal on Expropriation Compensation and Valuation Transparency
Cited in the reasoning to establish the minimum requirement for justifying a sovereign act (ruling) as part of the right to be heard.
A1 09 26 · vs (Art. 29 al. 3 LPJA)
Cantonal Commission Authority vs. Procedural Rights in Unauthorized Earthworks Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the fulfillment of motivation requirements, although the primary substantive ground for the verdict is procedural regarding the right to file a new application.