Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
172.6 VVRGLPJA CH-VS

Art. 1 Gesetz über das Verwaltungsverfahren und die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VVRG) - Grundsatz

Geltungsbereich und Begriffe - Geltungsbereich
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (114 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 1 VVRG · Grundsatz

1. Dieses Gesetz regelt das Verfahren in den Verwaltungssachen, die in die Zuständigkeit der Verwaltungs- und Verwaltungsrechtspflegebehörden fallen.

2. Im Übrigen findet es auf die Angelegenheiten des Sozialversicherungsrechts Anwendung, die in die Zuständigkeit des Sozialversicherungsgerichts fallen.

3. Vorbehalten bleiben die besonderen Bestimmungen des Verwaltungsrechts und des Sozialversicherungsrechts.

Gesetz über das Verwaltungsverfahren und die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VVRG) - Grundsatz Art. 2 VVRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (24)

S1 23 192 · vs (Art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Appellant Denied Full Disability Pension Despite Multiple Impairments
Cited in the reasoning supporting the final order concerning the costs imposed on the appellant.
S1 23 18 · vs (art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Minor Diabetic's Incapacity Allowance Appeal Remanded for Reassessment of Intensive Care Needs
Cited alongside cantonal law provisions concerning the right to costs and expenses in the appeal procedure.
A1 25 42 · vs (Art. 20 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 66 Abs. 1 und Art. 1 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Cantonal Appeal Dismissed for Improper Electronic Filing
Cited as the basis allowing the single judge to rule due to the evident inadmissibility of the case.
S1 24 129 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Based on Employment Status Assessment
Cited in the reasoning to establish which court (the Social Insurance Department of the Cantonal Court) is competent.
S2 24 80 · vs (Art. 58 Abs. 1 ATSG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Insurance Coverage for Chronic Pain Physiotherapy
These procedural provisions were used by the court to establish its jurisdiction as the cantonal insurance court.
S1 24 34 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Appeal Allowed for Insufficient Investigation of Increased Disability Pension Claim
Cited in the reasoning to define which Cantonal Court section is competent.
S1 22 122 · vs (art. 61 let. fbis LPGA, art. 69 al. 1bis LAI, art. 1 al. 2, 81a al. 2, 89 al. 1 LPJA)
Farmer's Disability Claim Rejected Due to Capacity for Sedentary Work
Cited for imposing judicial costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
S1 22 166 · vs (art. 61 let. fbis LPGA, art. 69 al. 1bis LAI, art. 1 al. 2, 81a al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)
Discontinuation of Rehabilitation Program Bars Continued Disability Allowances
Cited for the determination and imposition of court costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
S1 22 101 · vs (Art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Disability Pension Calculation Dispute Based on Skill Level and Statistical Table Application
Cited as a basis for setting the judicial costs.
S1 22 52 · vs (art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Homemaker Denied Disability Benefits After Accident
Cited in the context of imposing court costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
S1 21 176 · vs (art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Recurrent Depression Disability Benefits Appeal Upheld on Mixed Activity Assessment
Applied in conjunction with Art. 89 al. 1 LPJA concerning the imposition of costs.
S1 23 104 · vs (art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Disability Benefits Appeal: Developmental Impairment and Vocational Training
Provision cited as a basis for fixing the judicial costs.
S1 21 186 · vs (art. 1 al. 2 LPJA)
Pension Denial and Disability Assessment Appeal
Used to determine the amount of judicial costs imposed on the losing party.
S1 21 88 · vs (art. 1 al. 2, 81a al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Third Disability Benefit Application Based on Aggravation of Physical and Psychological Conditions
Cited as the basis for ordering the respondent to bear the court costs.
S1 22 178 · vs (Art. 69 Abs. 1 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Disability Claim Reinstatement Due to Insufficient Medical Review
These procedural rules establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.