Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
943.11 LPR CH-VD

Art. 4 Gesetz über die Reklameanlagen (LPR) - Verbotene Verfahren [ 6 ]

Titel I
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (34 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 4 LPR · Verbotene Verfahren [ 6 ]

1. Generell sind alle Werbeverfahren untersagt, die durch ihren Standort, ihre Abmessungen, ihre Beleuchtung, die Art der dargestellten Sujets, ihr Motiv oder den von ihnen verursachten Lärm das Erscheinungsbild oder die Ruhe eines Ortes, eines Aussichtspunkts, einer Ortschaft, eines Viertels, einer öffentlichen Straße, eines Sees oder eines Wasserlaufs beeinträchtigen oder die Verkehrssicherheit gefährden können, insbesondere

a. alle Werbeverfahren auf einem See, einem Wasserlauf oder an dessen Ufer, es sei denn, es wurden Ausnahmen durch die für die Wasserpolizei zuständige Dienststelle anlässlich von Veranstaltungen von allgemeinem Interesse nach vorheriger Anzeige bei der Gemeinde erteilt;

b. Werbe-Fesselballone oder Fesselballone mit Werbung;

c. alle externen akustischen Werbeverfahren, es sei denn, es wurden Ausnahmen durch die Gemeinde anlässlich von Veranstaltungen von allgemeinem Interesse oder bei politischen Kampagnen für einen begrenzten Zeitraum erteilt;

d. alle Werbeverfahren, die geeignet sind, eine Verwechslung mit Verkehrszeichen und -signalen zu verursachen oder deren Wirksamkeit zu mindern;

e. die Verwendung eines Fahrzeugs ohne Kontrollschilder für Werbezwecke, die nicht dem Verkauf des Fahrzeugs dienen.

← Art. 3 LPR Gesetz über die Reklameanlagen (LPR) - Aber Art. 5 LPS →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)

GE.2024.0351 · vd (art. 4 al. 1 i.f. LPR)
Gas Station Co-owner Appeal Regarding Advertising Sign Placement and Road Safety
The provision that establishes the potential harm to road safety, which was the main ground for rejecting the appeal.
GE.2023.0141 · vd (art. 4 let. d LPR)
Municipality v. Advertising Sign Permit Denial (Road Safety)
This provision regarding the prohibition of advertising harming public appearance or traffic safety was used in the reasoning to support the rejection of the appeal.
GE.2017.0043 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Digital Display Permit Refusal Upheld Against Visual Pollution Concerns
Cited as the general prohibition concerning advertising devices that harm the aspect or tranquility of a site or traffic safety.
GE.2017.0204 · vd (Art. 4 let. d LPR)
LED Screen Advertising Permit Refusal Upheld on Road Safety Grounds
Cited as a legal basis for the justified prohibition of the advertising devices due to potential harm to road safety.
GE.2016.0202 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Mannequin on Public Land Dispute
Cited as a legal basis for prohibiting advertising displays that harm the appearance or tranquility of a site, which justified the decision to deny authorization.
AC.2013.0150 · vd (Art. 4 al. 1 let. a LPR)
Port Operator vs. Property Owners: Retaining Wall and Concession Validity
Cited in the reasoning to explain the general prohibition on advertising signs, against which the court's decision provided an exception (though the exception itself is not cited in the dispositive, this article establishes the rule being overridden by the concession's scope mentioned in the reasoning).
GE.2014.0117 · vd (art. 4 let. d LPR)
Advertising Company v. Municipality (Billboard Installation Safety)
The restriction on the economic freedom was justified by the risk that the billboard could compromise road safety, as stipulated in this article.
GE.2010.0224 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Advertising Display Refusal Upheld on Traffic Safety Grounds
This cantonal law provision prohibiting advertising that harms the appearance of an area was cited as part of the legal basis for the municipality's decision, although the court ultimately focused on safety.
GE.2010.0078 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Advertising Panel Permit Refusal Overturned Due to Unsubstantiated Restrictions
Cited as the general prohibition principle against advertising detrimental to the site's appearance, forming the basis for the municipality's refusal power.
GE.2003.0115 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Municipality's Refusal to Approve Freestanding Advertising Panels Upheld
Although cited in the reasoning regarding aesthetic protection, it is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders.
GE.2001.0102 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Business v. Municipality Regarding Advertising Panel Authorization
Cited in the reasoning as the provision generally prohibiting advertising that harms the look or tranquility of a site, justifying the initial municipal refusal which is partially overturned in order II.
GE.2003.0084 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Billboard Authorization Appeal Overturning Municipal Refusal Based on Inapplicable Regulations and Unequal Treatment
This article, dealing with prohibitions based on aspect or traffic safety, forms part of the general legal framework considered in determining the admissibility of the placement.
GE.2002.0037 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Service Station Advertising Panels Appeal
This provision, cited in the reasoning (Considerant 2), sets the prohibition against advertising that harms the appearance or tranquility of a site, which is the core issue regarding the refusal of authorization.
GE.2002.0019 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Upheld in Refusing Advertising Panel Permit Based on Comprehensive Advertising Concept
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the prohibition against advertising that harms the appearance or tranquility of a site, but not in the dispositive.
GE.2001.0116 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Advertising Regulation Overturned Due to Arbitrary Zoning
The regulation's restrictive nature was considered contrary to LPR principles regarding prohibitions based on site harm.