Art. 49 Gesetz über das Gastgewerbe und den Ausschank von Getränken (LADB) - Vorübergehende Schließung [ 2 ]

GE.1999.0123 · vd (art. 49 al. 1 LADB)

Café Closure Upheld Due to Lack of Valid Permit and Ineligible Substitute Operator

Cited because the proposed new patent holder did not meet the requirement of personally and actually managing the establishment, as stipulated by this article.

GE.1998.0113 · vd (art. 49 LADB)

Association v. Department of License Revocation

The violation of this article (personal operation rule) justified the withdrawal of the patent mentioned in Art. 78 LADB.

GE.1997.0192 · vd (art. 49 LADB)

Hotel License Revocation for Prostitution and Regulatory Violations

Cited as a ground in the administrative decision regarding the failure to personally manage the establishment.

GE.1995.0043 · vd (art. 49 LADB)

Café Operator Fails to Secure License Following Partner's Departure, Closure Upheld

This article concerning the personal management obligation of the license holder was central to the reasoning for upholding the closure order.

GE.1992.0042 · vd (Art. 49 LADB)

Café-Restaurant Partial Transfer of Business and Public House Law Compliance

The court found that the principle of personal and effective management required by this article was not respected by the appellants.

GE.1992.0114 · vd (art. 49 LADB)

Café License Refusal Upheld Due to Part-Time Management

The appeal was rejected because the applicant did not meet the requirement of personally and actually managing the establishment, which is the basis for the decision.

GE.1992.0041 · vd (Art. 49 LADB)

Department Refusal to Approve Separate Management of Pub and Restaurant

The decision order rejects the appeal by Hotex Management SA because the operation of the establishment did not comply with the requirement for personal and effective management by the patent holder.