725.01
LROU
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 13 Strassengesetz (LRou) - Verfahren [ 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 ]
Kapitel II
Art. 13 LRou · Verfahren [ 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 ]
1. Bauprojekte werden für dreißig Tage in der oder den betroffenen Gemeindeterritorien öffentlich zur Einsicht aufgelegt.
2. Geringfügige Umgestaltungsprojekte, die im bestehenden Umriss realisiert werden, unterliegen einer dreißigtägigen öffentlichen Auflage. Sie bedürfen einer Baugenehmigung.
3. Für kommunale Pläne ist das Verabschiedungsorgan der Gemeinderat oder Stadtrat. Die Artikel 34 und 38 bis 45 LATC [D] finden entsprechende Anwendung.
4. Für kantonale Pläne ist das Verabschiedungsorgan das Departement. Die Artikel 12 bis 15 LATC finden entsprechende Anwendung.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (31)
AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 13 al. 2 LRou)
Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development
Cited by the court to demonstrate that the procedure followed for the road project regularization was potentially justified under this provision, thus excluding nullity.
AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 13 al. 3 de la loi cantonale du 10 décembre 1991 sur les routes (LRou; BLV 725.01))
Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development
Cited by the appellants in support of their argument for the absolute nullity of the decision regarding the public road transfer.
AC.2025.0083 · vd (art. 13 al. 2 LRou)
Municipality Road Easement Procedure Violation
Although the municipality based its initial decision on this article, the court did not cite it in the dispositive orders. The actual ground for the final decision (annulment) stems from the finding that the procedure under Art. 13 al. 3 LRou should have been followed instead.
AC.2024.0187 · vd (art. 13 al. 4 LRou)
Road Requalification vs. Historic Wall and Water Protection Appeal Dismissed
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal to review the decision on the plan and oppositions with full power of review.
AC.2023.0445 · vd (Art. 13 al. 3 LRou)
Municipality Appeal on Road Renovation Procedure Classification
The appeal was rejected because the project must be subject to the road planning procedure defined in this article, not the simplified building permit procedure.
AC.2022.0098 · vd (Art. 13 LRou)
Appeal Against Communal Pathway Authorization Procedure
The main legal framework governing the procedure for road construction projects that was central to the dispute.
AC.2022.0098 · vd (Art. 13 al. 1 LRou)
Appeal Against Communal Pathway Authorization Procedure
Cited in the context of defining the procedures for road construction projects, although not the basis for the final order.
AC.2022.0098 · vd (Art. 13 al. 2 LRou)
Appeal Against Communal Pathway Authorization Procedure
The court ruled that the simplified procedure under this article was not applicable to the project.
AC.2022.0098 · vd (Art. 13 al. 3 LRou)
Appeal Against Communal Pathway Authorization Procedure
The appeal was admitted because the project should have been subject to the planning procedure defined by this article.
AC.2022.0101 · vd (Art. 13 LRou)
Appeal Against Lakeside Path Approval Due to Procedural Flaws
The project approval procedure is governed by this article, which leads to the annulment of the approval decision when procedure is violated.
AC.2016.0257 · vd (Art. 13 al. 3 LRou)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Passage Servitude Procedure
The court determined that the correct procedure for establishing the servitude was the ordinary 'road plan' procedure, based on Art. 13 al. 3 LRou, not the simplified building permit procedure.
AC.2016.0023 · vd (art. 13 LRou)
Municipal Building Permits Affirmed; Public Easement Overturned Due to Procedural Flaw
The successful appeal regarding the servitude is based on the failure to follow the procedure stipulated in this article for municipal road plans.
AC.2015.0192 · vd (art. 13 LRou)
Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Insufficient Road Access and Procedural Flaws
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure required for road construction projects that alter the existing right-of-way/gabarit, a necessary prerequisite for the access being deemed adequate.
AC.2015.0192 · vd (art. 13 al. 2 LRou)
Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Insufficient Road Access and Procedural Flaws
Cited in the reasoning when determining that the required road widening was not a 'minor redevelopment' that could be authorized via a simplified building permit procedure.
69.2015.PHC · vd (art. 13 LRou)
Hotel Expansion Road Improvement Dispute
Cited to indicate the competent authority for adopting road construction projects (municipal council for municipal plans).