Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
710.01 LE CH-VD

Art. 23 Enteignungsgesetz (LE) - Entscheidung des Finanzdepartements [ 1 ]

Titel II, Kapitel II
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (141 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 23 LE - Entscheidung des Finanzdepartements [ 1 ] · Entscheidung des Finanzdepartements [ 1 ]

1. Das Finanzdepartement entscheidet innerhalb einer Frist von vier Monaten ab Erhalt des Dossiers. Diese Frist kann im Einvernehmen zwischen dem Finanzdepartement und dem Enteigner um höchstens zwei Monate verlängert werden.

2. Wenn das Finanzdepartement das öffentliche Interesse nicht anerkennt, trägt der Antragsteller der Enteignung die Untersuchungskosten. Der Vermerk „Enteignung“ wird im Grundbuch gelöscht. Prozesskosten werden nur in Ausnahmefällen gewährt.

3. Wenn das Finanzdepartement das öffentliche Interesse anerkennt, bestimmt es die Inanspruchnahmen, wobei es darauf achtet, dass die Enteignung innerhalb der Grenzen bleibt, die zur Durchführung des Projekts erforderlich sind. Es kann Bedingungen und Einschränkungen oder geringfügige Änderungen auferlegen, die keine schutzwürdigen Interessen beeinträchtigen. Jede andere Änderung erfordert ein neues Verfahren, beginnend mit der Veröffentlichung zur Einsichtnahme.

← Art. 22 LE Enteignungsgesetz (LE) - Definition Art. 24 LE - Erweiterung [ 1 ] →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)

AC.2019.0240 · vd (Art. 23 al. 3 LE)
Expropriation Public Interest Upheld Despite Administrative Delay
The court confirmed the challenged decision, which correctly determined that the expropriation footprints were contained within the limits required by the project execution, as mandated by this article.
GE.2021.0107 · vd (Art. 23 al. 3 LE)
Municipality Expropriation for Water Outlet Upheld
The court confirmed the decision based on the precise scope of the expropriation emprises defined by the plans and land registry requisition, which are related to the limits imposed by this provision.
RE.2015.0008 · vd (Art. II. La décision sur effet suspensif prise le 23 avril 2015 par le Juge instructeur de la CDAP est confirmée.)
Appeal Regarding Immediate Closure for Fire Safety Hazards
This is the main order confirming the decision being appealed (implicit ground for judgment).
CR.2009.0078 · vd (art. 23 let. b du règlement du 7 juillet 2004 sur les émoluments perçus par le SAN (RE-SAN; RSV 741.15.1))
Driving License Withdrawal Based on Dementia and Alcohol Dependence Upheld Pending Multidisciplinary Medical Expertise
This provision was used to justify the confirmation of the 200 franc administrative fee for the license withdrawal decision.
FI.2009.0100 · vd (art. 23 al. 1 let. f du règlement du Conseil d’Etat du 7 juillet 2004 sur les émoluments perçus par le SAN (RE-SAN; RSV 741.15.1))
Driver v. Traffic Authority (Procedural Fees for Missed Medical Examination)
This provision justified the imposition of the procedure fee, which the court subsequently annulled in its orders.
PE.2008.0265 · vd (art. 23 al. 1 de l’ancienne loi fédérale du 26 mars 1931 sur le séjour et l’établissement des étrangers (LSEE))
Fraudulent Permit Application and Marriage Permit Denial Appeal
Mentioned in the factual background (Ordonnance) as the basis for the applicant's criminal conviction, not used in the final orders I-IV.
PE.2007.0406 · vd (Art. 23 alinéa 1 de la loi fédérale du 26 mars 1931 sur le séjour et l'établissement des étrangers (LSEE))
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit Based on Convenience Marriage
This article was cited as the basis for the prior fine imposed on the appellant, which contributed to the suspicion of a sham marriage, although it is not the direct ground for the dispositive ruling on the residence permit.
FO.2005.0009 · vd (art. 23 de la loi d’application de la loi fédérale du 4 octobre 1985 sur le bail à ferme agricole (LVLBFA))
Administrative Court Dismisses Appeal Against Supplementary Agricultural Leasing Decision
The court cited this provision to confirm the appeal was filed within the relevant thirty-day deadline, even though the appeal was ultimately declared inadmissible.
CR.2005.0392 · vd (art. 23 al. 1 lettre b du règlement sur les émoluments perçus par le Service des automobiles et de la navigation, du 7 juillet 2004 (RSV 741.15.1, ci-après : RESA))
Driver License Suspension Fee Appeal Rejected
This provision established the fee for the permit withdrawal procedure, which the court confirmed was due despite the appeal.
PE.2004.0359 · vd (Art. 23 de la loi fédérale sur le séjour et l'établissement des étrangers du 26 mars 1931 RS 142.20 (ci-après LSEE))
Thai National Residence Permit Denial Appeal
Cited in the decision of the Service de l'emploi (referenced in the facts) regarding sanctions for violating the decision.
PE.2001.0492 · vd (art. 23 al. 3 de l'Ordonnance limitant le nombre des étrangers du 6 octobre 1986 (OLE))
Employer v. Labor Office Regarding Cross-Border Worker Permit Denial
This provision concerning the requirements for cross-border workers is the basis for the annulment of the decision, as the court found the criteria regarding location and daily return were met despite the administrative list.
FO.2000.0011 · vd (article 23 de la loi vaudoise d'application de la loi fédérale du 4 octobre 1895 sur le bail à ferme agricole (LVBFA: RSV 3.5.C))
Lessor v. Tenants: Appeal of Agricultural Lease Rent Reduction Decision
Cited as the cantonal legal basis confirming the appeal was filed on time.
EF.1999.0004 · vd (Art. 23 al. 2 de la loi du 27 février 1963 concernant le droit de mutation sur les transferts immobiliers et l'impôt sur les successions et donations)
Property Tax Reassessment Challenge Following Donation
Cited as the legal basis allowing the request for a tax assessment revision following the donation.
FI.1992.0105 · vd (art. 23 de la loi sur le logement)
Tax Exemption Denial for Housing Corporation Lacking Pure Public Utility Status
The rejection of the appeal is based on the finding that the appellant does not meet the conditions of this cantonal law for obtaining the exemption.