173.61 LJT

CH-VD

Art. 3 Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz (LJT) - Grundsatz

Kapitel I

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (12 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 3 LJT - Grundsatz · Grundsatz

1. Von der Zuständigkeit des Arbeitsgerichts kann nur durch eine Schiedsklausel abgewichen werden, die die Parteien bindet und in einen Tarifvertrag aufgenommen ist. Die Artikel 10 und 23 des Gesetzes über den Arbeitsdienst und die Dienstvermietung [A] bleiben vorbehalten.

2. Streitigkeiten zwischen einer öffentlichen Körperschaft oder einer öffentlichen Einrichtung und einem ernannten Beamten unterliegen nicht den Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes.

3. Vorbehaltlich entgegenstehender Bestimmungen, insbesondere derjenigen, die durch das Gesetz über das Personal des Staates Waadt [D] vorgesehen sind, können Personen, die durch Vertrag bei einer öffentlichen Körperschaft oder einer öffentlichen Einrichtung angestellt sind, die zuständigen Arbeitsgerichtsbarkeiten gemäß den vorliegenden Bestimmungen anrufen.

← Art. 2 LJT - Zuständigkeit Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz (LJT) - Gegenstand Art. 4 LJT - Entschädigung →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

GE.2021.0027 · vd (Art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Employment Contract Termination Jurisdiction Dispute

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that disputes concerning an employee engaged by contract fall under the jurisdiction of the labour courts, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal before this court.

GE.2020.0172 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Director Employment Termination Contractual vs. Administrative Dispute

The court used this provision to establish that the litigation concerning the termination of the contract falls under the jurisdiction of the labour courts.

HC.2019.45 · vd (Art. 3 LJT)

Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Over Employment Contract Debt

This provision was explicitly cited in the text to define the scope of competence regarding labor jurisdiction, which was the core issue resolved in the decision.

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 2 et 3 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to determine that labor jurisdiction (civil) is competent, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the primacy of the labour jurisdiction law over administrative recourse provisions, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to exclude the case from the non-application to civil servants, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning to classify the appellant as an employee engaged by contract by a public entity, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

GE.2016.0100 · vd (art. 3 LJT)

Jurisdiction Dispute Over Private Law Employment Contract Termination by Municipality

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of the labor courts, which justifies the administrative appeal being inadmissible.

HC.2016.196 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 LJT)

Liability for Unpaid Wages Against Individuals Operating an Unregistered Company

Cited in the preamble, justifying the imperative nature of the Labor Court's jurisdiction.

HC.2013.837 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 LJT)

Municipality Hiring Dispute: Public Service Law Jurisdiction Upheld

Used to determine that the dispute concerning the engagement of a civil servant by a public entity is not subject to the Labour Jurisdiction Act.

HC.2009.261 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)

Municipality Employment Contract Dispute Jurisdiction

This provision is the main legal ground for reforming the first instance decision to confirm the competence of the Labour Tribunal for an employee engaged by contract by a public entity.