173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 87 Gesetz über das Verwaltungsverfahren (LPA-VD) - Maßnahmen äußerster Dringlichkeit
Kapitel IV
Art. 87 LPA-VD - Maßnahmen äußerster Dringlichkeit · Maßnahmen äußerster Dringlichkeit
1. Wenn Gefahr in Verzug ist, kann die Behörde sofort Maßnahmen im Sinne von Artikel 86 anordnen, ohne die Gegenpartei zu hören.
2. In diesem Fall setzt die Behörde der Gegenpartei eine kurze Frist zur Stellungnahme und erlässt anschließend ebenfalls kurzfristig eine Entscheidung, die die angeordneten Maßnahmen bestätigt oder aufhebt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)
2.2019 · vd (art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Conflict of Interest Allegations in Litigation: Denial of Provisional Measures
Cited in the reasoning to explain the requirements for ordering measures immediately without hearing the other party, which was relevant to rejecting the urgency request.
AC.2015.0362 · vd (art. 87 LPA-VD)
Developer Appeal of Occupancy Permit Condition Regarding Solar Collectors
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of requesting urgent provisional measures.
Ord.2010.11 · vd (Art. 87 LPA-VD)
Pension Fund Lump-Sum Payment Order
Cited at the beginning, indicating the legal basis for the judge's actions concerning provisional measures, although its specific application is implied by the issuance of the orders rather than explicitly named in the dispositive orders I-III.
AI.7.09 · vd (Art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Disability Pension Appeal and Denial of Urgent Measure for Retroactive Payment
Cited to explain the condition for ordering provisional measures immediately without hearing the adverse party (peril in delay), which the court ultimately found not met.
AA.43.08.33.2009 · vd (Art. 87 LPA-VD)
Rejection of Provisional Measures Application Due to Lack of Imminent Danger and Failure to Hear Opposing Party
The urgent provisional measure request was rejected based on the conditions outlined in this article.
AA.43.08.33.2009 · vd (art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Rejection of Provisional Measures Application Due to Lack of Imminent Danger and Failure to Hear Opposing Party
The court found that the requirements for ruling without hearing the opposing party under this specific paragraph were not met.