173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 33 Gesetz über das Verwaltungsverfahren (LPA-VD) - Recht auf Gehör
Kapitel II, Abschnitt IV
Art. 33 LPA-VD - Recht auf Gehör · Recht auf Gehör
1. Sofern keine Gefahr im Verzug besteht, haben die Parteien das Recht, angehört zu werden, bevor eine sie betreffende Entscheidung getroffen wird.
2. Sofern keine ausdrücklichen entgegenstehenden Bestimmungen vorliegen, können sie nicht verlangen, von der Behörde angehört zu werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (48)
PS.2024.0054 · vd (Art. 33 LPA-VD)
Recipient's Refusal to Comply Justifies Termination of Social Assistance
Cited in the reasoning to specify the right of parties to be heard before a decision affecting them.
AC.2023.0112 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Owner v. Municipality (Right to Be Heard in Zoning Violation)
This article, codifying the right to be heard, was the basis for finding that the municipality violated the appellant's rights, leading to the annulment of the decision.
CR.2023.0010 · vd (Art. 33 al. 2 LPA-VD)
License Withdrawal Upheld Following Reckless Overtaking Conviction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rejection of requests for evidentiary measures, confirming that the right to be heard does not include an oral hearing or witness examination if the means are not decisive.
PE.2021.0145 · vd (art. 33 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Residence Permit Refusal and Deportation Order Dismissed Due to Marriage of Convenience Finding
Cited to establish cantonal procedural rules concerning the right to be heard before a decision.
PE.2021.0164 · vd (art. 33 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Expulsion of Illegal Resident with Criminal Record Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right of the parties not to be heard orally, although not explicitly used in the final disposal orders (except implicitly by not granting the request).
CR.2021.0016 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appellant v. Driving Authority: License Suspension for Driving on Withdrawn License Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the right to be heard at the cantonal level, but not in the dispositive.
AC.2020.0148 · vd (art. 33 ss et 44 LPA-VD)
Tenants' Challenge to Exemption of Rental Villas from Housing Stock Preservation Law
Cited as the basis for the violation of the right to be heard concerning the parties' right to express themselves in the prior administrative procedure.
GE.2020.0020 · vd (Art. 33 LPA-VD)
Administrative Court Overturns Firearm Hunting Ban Due to Procedural Flaws and Prematurity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the violation of the right to be heard, which founded the partial admission of the appeal.
MPU.2020.0009 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Exclusion from Public Works Adjudication Due to Subcontracting Share Discrepancies
Cited in the reasoning concerning the violation of the right to be heard, which is a basis for the annulment.
GE.2018.0160 · vd (art. 33 ss LPA-VD)
Foundation President Dismissal Appeal Mootness and Procedural Violation
The court notes that the initial decision violated the right to be heard, which is covered by these articles, justifying the decision regarding costs and fees.
AC.2019.0310 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Neighboring Owners v. Municipality (Supplementary Building Permit for Crèche Modifications)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard before a decision is rendered.
AC.2019.0018 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Property Owner Appeal Against Illegal Balcony Expansion in Protected Forest Zone
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right of parties to be heard before a decision concerning them.
GE.2019.0151 · vd (art. 33 LPA-VD)
Refusal of Citizenship Due to Tax Arrears
Cited in connection with the right to be heard.
GE.2019.0173 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Municipal Exclusion from Family Garden Plot Over Alleged Illicit Sublease and Lack of Due Process
Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal implementation of the right to be heard before a decision is made.
PE.2019.0367 · vd (art. 33 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Residence Permit Refusal Appeal Based on Extreme Hardship
Cited in the reasoning section stating that parties do not have an inherent right to be heard orally unless expressly provided otherwise.