173.31.1
ROTC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 33 ORGANISCHES REGLEMENT des Kantonsgerichts (ROTC) - Zusammensetzung des Gerichts
Kapitel I, Abschnitt IV
Art. 33 ROTC - Zusammensetzung des Gerichts · Zusammensetzung des Gerichts
1. Das Verwaltungs- und Öffentliche Rechtshof tagt mit drei Richtern
a. wenn es über eine Nebenbeschwerde entscheidet;
b. wenn es im Wesentlichen komplexe Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden hat.
2. Es tagt mit zwei Richtern und einem Beisitzer oder einem Richter und zwei Beisitzern in den übrigen Fällen. Die Wahl zwischen diesen beiden Zusammensetzungsarten berücksichtigt folgende Kriterien
a. Notwendigkeit spezifischer technischer Kenntnisse;
b. Grad der Komplexität der zu lösenden Rechtsfragen.
3. Die Richter, die zusätzlich zum Untersuchungsrichter zur Entscheidung berufen werden, werden abwechselnd bestimmt.
4. Die Beisitzer mit der gleichen Spezialisierung werden abwechselnd bestimmt, unter Vorbehalt ihrer Verfügbarkeit.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (9)
RE.2017.0013 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appeal Concerning Boundary Correction Access and Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning to establish the composition of the Court (3 judges), but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders.
PE.2015.0167 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appellant v. Population Service (Entry Authorization Refusal)
Cited by the judge in the reasoning section as a rule allowing the judge to submit the case to the full Court.
PE.2013.0482 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 (ROTC; RSV 173.31.1))
Appeal of Population Service Visa Extension Refusal Mooted by Departure
This provision, cited in the reasoning regarding the judge's power to refer the case to the full court, is not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
AC.2012.0166 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. b du règlement organique du Tribunal cantonal, du 13 novembre 2007 – ROTC, RSV 173.31.1)
Property Owner Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Rezoning
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the judge rapporteur to submit the case to the full court due to complexity.
PE.2011.0285 · vd (art. 33 ROTC)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unsigned Submission and Missed Fee Payment
This provision dictated that the Administrative and Public Law Court must rule in its ordinary composition due to doubts regarding the single judge's authority.
BO.2010.0030 · vd (Art. 33 al. 1 let. b ROTC)
Student Grant Repayment Following Exmatriculation Despite Later Appeal Overturn
Cited in the reasoning regarding the composition of the bench but not in the final operative orders (I-IV).
CP.2007.0012 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 lit. a ROTC)
Revision of Unemployment Benefit Denial Based on Subsequent Case Law
This provision was used to determine that the case should be decided by a panel of three judges.
RE.2008.0019 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a ROTC)
Day-Care Suspension Appeal Granted Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning regarding the panel composition for deciding the appeal, but not explicitly used in the final orders (orders I-V).
RE.2008.0013 · vd (art. 33 al. 1 let. a ROTC)
Restaurant Terrace Capacity Dispute and Stay of Execution Appeal
Cited to establish that the Administrative and Public Law Court section (three judges) rules on decisions regarding the suspensive effect during the incidental appeal procedure.