188.100
LOP
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 6 LOP Patrizier-Gesetz (PG)
LOP
Art. 6 LOP
Für den Zweck, dem sie dienen, unterteilen sich die Verwaltungsartikel in
a) Güter, die in erster Linie für die Ausübung der landwirtschaftlichen Tätigkeit bestimmt sind, bestehend aus Nutzungs- oder Primärgütern wie Wäldern, Alpen, Maggenghi, Wiesen, Weiden mit den dazugehörigen Weide-, Holzfäll- und Streurechten, die durch das Reglement des Patriziats festgelegt sind;
b) Güter, die auch zur sozialen Nutzung bestimmt sind, wie Wälder, Weideland und andere Flächen im Tal und im Gebirge mit ihren Zugangs- und Erschliessungswegen und den dazugehörigen Schutzbauten sowie eventuellen Infrastrukturen wie Aquädukten und Seilbahnen;
c) Gebäude;
d) Schutz- und Präventionsbauten gegen Wildbäche und Lawinen, zur Bodensicherung;
e) Sportanlagen;
f) Steinbrüche;
g) Kulturgüter wie das Archiv.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (16)
17.2014.58 · ti (art. 6 lett. d LOP)
Appeals Court Modifies Sentences in Aggravated Attempted Robbery Case Involving Firearm Use
Confirmed the conviction for acts against public safety (Art. 6 lett. d LOP) and imposed the corresponding fine (Art. 1.4.2, 1.6.2, 8.2, 8.4).
81.2011.467 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
Dog Owner Acquitted of Public Safety Violation After Dog Bite
This article defines the offense (acts against public safety) for which the defendant was acquitted in order 1.
17.2012.6 · ti (Art. 6 lett. a LOP)
Threat Conviction Upheld Despite Acquittal on Public Safety Charge
Used to acquit the appellant from the charge of acts against public safety (atti contro la pubblica incolumità).
10.2010.182 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
State v. Defendant (Endangering Public Safety - Dog Bite Incident)
This provision defines the crime for which the accused was acquitted in the final order.
10.2009.100 · ti (art. 6 lett. d LOP)
Acquittal for Public Safety Violation: Firecracker Throwing at Dog
The court acquitted the accused of the crime defined by this article.
10.2008.327 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
Acquittal in Wolf Dog Leash Violation Case Due to Lack of Intent and Jurisdictional Issues
This provision defines the offense of which the defendant was ultimately acquitted.
72.2007.5 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
Arson Conspiracy and Related Offenses Involving Instigator, Perpetrator, and Accomplice
Cited in the legal basis for the conviction of AC 2 (contravention of public order law).
10.2006.234 · ti (art. 6 cifra 1 LOP)
Acquittal in Dog Attack Case Due to Lack of Intent
Cited as the legal basis for the charge of acts against public safety from which the defendant was acquitted.
10.2005.246 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
Dog Owner Convicted of Assault and Endangerment Due to Unleashed Dogs
The defendant was declared guilty of repeated acts against public safety based on this article in the dispositive order.
10.2003.557 · ti (art. 6 lett. a LOP)
Public Order Violation (Dog Offense) Sentencing
This article defines the crime for which the defendant was found guilty in the operative part (order 1 and the final conviction statement).
10.2003.557 · ti (art. 6 lett. a LOP)
Public Order Law Violation Regarding Free-Roaming Dog
This provision defines the crime of repeated violation of Public Order, which the defendant was found guilty of in the final order (Point 1 of the operative part of the ruling).
10.2005.246 · ti (art. 6 LOP)
Aggravated Dog Ownership Liability Case
Used to establish the conviction for repeated acts against public safety.
10.2006.234 · ti (art. 6 cifra 1 LOP)
Dog Attack Acquittal Due to Lack of Intent
The accused was acquitted of the charge under this article concerning acts against public safety.
10.2009.100 · ti (art. 6 lett. d LOP)
Petard Throwing Not Covered by Public Order Law
This provision defined the crime of which the accused was acquitted in the first point of the dispositive.
72.2007.5 · ti (Art. 6 LOP)
Custody Dispute Arson and Related Offenses Convictions
The provision is cited as the basis for the conviction of AC 2 for violation of Public Order Law (contravvenzione alla Legge sull’ordine pubblico) (point 19).