165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 35 VwVG Verwaltungs-Verfahrensgesetz (VwVG)
LPAmm
Art. 35 VwVG
1 Das Recht auf Anhörung wird in der Regel schriftlich ausgeübt.
2 Die Behörde hört die Parteien an, bevor sie einen Entscheid trifft.
3 Sie ist nicht verpflichtet, die Parteien anzuhören, bevor sie insbesondere folgende Entscheide trifft
a) einen Zwischen- oder Voranentscheid, der nicht selbständig mit Beschwerde angefochten werden kann;
b) einen Entscheid, der mit Einsprache oder Rekurs angefochten werden kann;
c) einen Entscheid, der den Anträgen der Parteien vollumfänglich entspricht;
d) eine Vollzugsmassnahme.
4 Die Behörde hört die Parteien nicht an, bevor sie einen Entscheid trifft, wenn in einem erstinstanzlichen Verfahren Gefahr im Verzug ist oder wenn eine vorgängige Anhörung den Zweck des Entscheids vereiteln könnte, sofern der Entscheid mit Beschwerde angefochten werden kann und keine andere Bestimmung den Parteien das Recht auf vorgängige Anhörung einräumt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (24)
52.2024.256 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Teacher Suspension Appeal Over Procedural Due Process Violation
The court implicitly used this provision as the reasoning for denying the immediate suspension without prior hearing was that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying recourse to this exceptional rule.
52.2023.146 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Police Vice-Commander Termination and Suspension Challenge
Cited in the context explaining the exceptional situations where the right to be heard can be bypassed due to urgency.
90.2017.12 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 1 e 2 LPAmm)
State Council Resolution Annulled Over Violation of Property Owner's Right to Be Heard in Zoning Dispute
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the requirements for the right to be heard.
90.2017.13 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 3 e 4 LPAmm)
Municipality v. State Council: Zoning Revision, Right to Be Heard, and Energy Standards Compliance
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, this provision was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1 or 2 regarding the merits or procedure.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Due to Lack of Motivation and Document Access
Cited in the reasoning regarding prior notification to the appellant before issuing the contested decision.
52.2018.216 · ti (art. 35 LPAmm)
Revocation of State Representative Appointment and Procedural Review
Cited as the cantonal procedural basis governing how the right to be heard is exercised (generally in writing and before the decision).
36.2012.87 · ti (art. 35 lett. d LPamm)
Insurance Obligation Reopened Due to Lack of Amnesty Information
Cited as an alternative basis for revision, mirroring Art. 53 para. 1 LPGA, in the context of analyzing the appellant's claims.
36.2012.87 · ti (art. 35 lett. d LPamm)
Insurance Obligation Reopened Due to Lack of Amnesty Information
Cited in the final summary paragraph as the relevant provision for revision based on new facts, which the court found not met.
11.2011.95 · ti (art. 35 segg. LPAmm)
Appeal Dismissed for Inadmissibility in Guardianship Records Access Case
Cited as the primary regulation governing the admissibility and procedure of the revision request reviewed in this decision.
36.2009.179 · ti (Art. 35 LPAmm)
Mandatory Health Insurance Obligation Upheld on Revision Request
The court reviewed whether the grounds for revision under this article were met, which justified the administrative rejection of the request that led to the appeal.
36.2009.179 · ti (Art. 35 lett. d LPAmm)
Mandatory Health Insurance Obligation Upheld on Revision Request
Specifically mentioned as a ground for revision based on the discovery of new relevant facts or decisive evidence.
40.2008.6 · ti (art. 35 LPamm)
Expropriation Valuation Revision Application Denied Due to Subsequent Cadastral Changes
Although cited in the reasoning, the rejection of the revision request (Order 1) is based on the non-fulfillment of the grounds for revision listed under this article.
90.1998.46 · ti (art. 35 Lpamm)
Property Owner's Attempt to Overturn Land Use Zoning Denial Fails Due to Irrelevant New Evidence
This provision dictates the grounds for revision, and the court analyzed and rejected the application based on its stipulations (specifically letter d).
20.2005.21 · ti (art. 35 segg. LPamm)
Private Complaint Against Road Bollards Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing
Cited implicitly by ruling that the appeal did not qualify as a request for revision under these articles.
36.2012.87 · ti (art. 35 lett. d LPamm)
Insured Worker's Right to Opt-Out of Mandatory Swiss Health Insurance Reconsidered Due to Administrative Failure to Counsel
Cited in the context of the substantive grounds for revision, similar to Art. 53 para. 1 LPGA.