165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 32 VwVG Verwaltungs-Verfahrensgesetz (VwVG)
LPAmm
Art. 32 VwVG
1 Wer in einem Verwaltungsverfahren Partei ist, hat das Recht, die Akten einzusehen und sich zudem Kopien davon ausfertigen zu lassen, sofern dies für die Behörde keinen unverhältnismässigen Aufwand mit sich bringt.
2 Stehen dem keine überwiegenden öffentlichen oder privaten Interessen entgegen, so kann die Behörde den Parteien oder deren Rechtsvertretern die amtlichen Akten zur Einsichtnahme übermitteln.
3 Für die Ausfertigung von Kopien und die Übermittlung von Akten kann die Behörde eine Gebühr erheben. Der Staatsrat legt den Tarif fest.
4 Die Einsichtnahme in Akten, die ausschliesslich auf elektronischem Träger geführt werden, erfolgt nach Massgabe der vom Staatsrat festgelegten Modalitäten. [5]
[5] Abs. in Kraft seit 1.2.2024 – ABl 2013, 453 und ABl 2024, 1.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)
52.2024.302 · ti (art. 32 LPAmm)
Appointment Annulled Due to Insufficient Verification of Required Experience in Job-Sharing Section Head Role
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the right to consult the case files, a procedural right addressed during the review.
52.2024.308 · ti (art. 32 LPAmm)
Appeal Against Cantonal Gallery Director Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Verification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to examine the file, but not explicitly in the final orders (1-4).
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 32 LPAmm)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Due to Lack of Motivation and Document Access
Cited in the reasoning concerning the right to inspect files, which was central to the partial acceptance of the appeal.
90.2013.23 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Cantonal Council Recusal Due to Prior Development Plan Involvement
This procedural rule was cited as establishing that for administrative authority members, the grounds for abstention and recusal provided in the Code of Civil Procedure apply.
52.2011.89 · ti (Art. 32 LPamm)
State Council Recusal in Municipal Tax Multiplier Case
This article establishes that the grounds for recusation of administrative authority members are those provided for in civil procedure, which justifies accepting the recusation request against the State Council.
52.2009.236 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Municipal Tax Multiplier Discretion Violates Tax Legality Principle
The State Council improperly failed to forward the request for disqualification of the entire body, as required by this procedural rule for disqualifications concerning the entire executive.
90.2008.76 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Property Owners v. State Council on Zoning Variation Disqualification
This procedural rule mandates that administrative authorities refer to the grounds for exclusion/recusal specified in the Civil Procedure Code when taking decisions.
52.2010.49 · ti (Art. 32 LPamm)
Bidder Exclusion Over Conflict of Interest in Public Contract Upheld, Contract Award Confirmed
Cited in the final ruling grounds, relating to the procedure for imposing costs and referencing substantive procedural rules (CPC).
52.2009.334 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Council of State Recusal Due to Prejudicial Prior Ruling on Construction Permit
Cited in the final orders preamble and used to apply CPC articles for the accepted recusal.
11.1996.88 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Recusal of Tutelage Supervisory Authority Referred to State Council
This provision was cited by the appellant in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction, but it was ultimately superseded by the finding of incompetence via Art. 126 CPC.
90.1994.369 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Challenge to Historical Center Plan Modification for New Government Seat
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirements for the State Council to recuse itself due to potential bias.
90.1994.369 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 3 LPamm)
Challenge to Historical Center Plan Modification for New Government Seat
Cited in the context of the procedural requirement for filing a motion for recusation against the State Council.
52.2009.334 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Cantonal Court partially upholds recusal of State Council in construction permit revocation case due to bias.
Cited as the legal basis governing recusal procedures for members of administrative authorities, referencing the CPC.
52.2010.49 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Procurement Exclusion Due to Familial Conflict of Interest Upheld Despite Lack of Competitive Advantage
Cited in the introductory list; relates to the transposition of CPC rules concerning recusal into the administrative procedure.
52.2011.89 · ti (art. 32 LPamm)
Cantonal Council Recusal and Direct Appeal in Tax Multiplier Determination
Provision governing the competence of the Administrative Tribunal to decide on the recusation of the entire State Council.