Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
101 V-NBNE CH-NE

Art. 4 Verfassung der Republik und des Kantons Neuenburg (V-Ct.NE), vom 24. September 2000 - Amtssprache

1 Staat - Volk - Behörden - 10 Verfassung und andere grundlegende Rechtsakte - Erster Titel - Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (113 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 4 Verfassung der Republik und des Kantons Neuenburg (V-Ct.NE), vom 24. September 2000 - Amtssprache · Amtssprache

Die Amtssprache des Kantons ist Französisch.

← Art. 3 Verfassung der Republik und des Kantons Neuenburg (V Cst. NE) vom 24. September 2000 - Wappen des Kantons Die Republik und der Kanton Neuenburg Art. 5 Verfassung der Republik und des Kantons Neuenburg (Vf. NE), vom 24. September 2000 - Aufgaben des Staates und der Gemeinden →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (33)

CCP.1994.6143 · ne (art. 4 Cst.féd.)
Federal Tribunal Upholds Narcotics Convictions Following Undercover Operation
Cited as a legal basis for the presumption of innocence, which underpins the rejection of K.'s factual claims in the dismissal order.
ARMC.2024.75 · ne (art. 4 Cst. féd.)
Property Servitude Dispute: Appeal on Costs and Indemnity Following Settlement
Cited regarding the court's discretion in assessing the allocation of costs (Art. 106 al. 2 CPC).
CMPEA.2022.69 · ne (Art. 4 Cost Order (Implied by context of point 4 of the dispositive))
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Concerning Child Support Order and Retroactive Arrears Adjustment
Although not explicitly numbered as an article, the directive in order 4 sets court costs for the appeal based on the outcome (Art. 318 CPC context).
CCP.2000.56 · ne (art.4 Cst.)
Conviction Based on Uncross-examined Testimony Violates Right to Confrontation
Cited as the domestic constitutional basis for the right to a fair trial and cross-examination.
CCP.1998.6686 · ne (article 4 Cst féd.)
Cabaret Closing Hours Regulation Void for Inequality
The unconstitutionality of Article 38 was established based on its violation of this article regarding equal treatment.
TA.1999.76 · ne (Art. 4 al. 2 Cst.féd.)
Student Headscarf Ban Overturned in Secular School Dispute
Although heavily discussed concerning equality, it was not the basis for the final order to reject the appeal, which was instead grounded on the failure of the prior decision's justification.
CCP.1998.6640 · ne (art.4 Cst.féd.)
Appellant v. Appellee: Annulment of Conviction for Property Damage and Procedural Formalism
Used to justify that excessive formalism against the appellant, who relied on incorrect police information, is prohibited.
CCP.1998.6719 · ne (article 4 Cst.féd.)
Employee Appeal on Breach of Trust and Forgery Conviction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the presumption of innocence, but not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.
CCP.1998.6613 · ne (Art. 4 Cst féd.)
Appeal Inadmissibility Regarding Default Judgment Challenge
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the interpretation of conditions for setting aside a default judgment, but was not cited in the final orders.
CCP.1998.6657 · ne (article 4 Cst.féd.)
Negligent Arson Conviction Upheld Despite Innocence Claim
Cited as a foundation for the presumption of innocence.
CCP.1998.6637 · ne (article 4 Cst.féd.)
Sexual Abuse and Weapons Possession Conviction Upheld on Appeal
Cited as the constitutional basis for the presumption of innocence principle, which the court confirmed was not violated.
CCP.1998.6624 · ne (Art. 4 Cst. féd.)
Mandatory Treatment Conversion Overturned Due to Insufficient Justification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for the judgment to be motivated sufficiently for appellate review, although not directly used in the final operative part concerning the cassation.
CCP.1998.6615 · ne (Art. 4 Cst.féd.)
Racist Insults in Public Altercation Upheld on Appeal
Used as the primary standard to assess whether the factual findings of the lower court constituted arbitrariness, justifying the rejection of the appeal.
CCP.1998.6588 · ne (art. 4 Cst fédérale)
Co-Owner Dispute Involving Assault, Insults, and Discretionary Acquittals Upheld on Appeal
Invoked by S. in her appeal arguments (in the body of the text) but not cited in the dispositive.
CCP.1997.6556 · ne (Art. 4 Cst.fédérale)
Complicity in Theft Conviction Upheld Despite Recantation
Cited in the reasoning section to discuss the presumption of innocence, but not explicitly included in the final orders (which only reject the appeal and allocate costs).