631.1 DSTGLICD

CH-FR

Art. 27 Gesetz über die direkten Kantonssteuern (DStG) - Unselbstständige Erwerbstätigkeit

Steuern der natürlichen Personen - Einkommenssteuer - Abzüge

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (293 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 27 DStG · Unselbstständige Erwerbstätigkeit

1. Als Berufskosten werden abgezogen

a) die notwendigen Kosten für Fahrten zwischen Wohn- und Arbeitsstätte bis zu einem Höchstbetrag von 12'000 Franken;

b) die notwendigen Mehrkosten für Verpflegung ausserhalb der Wohnstätte und bei Schichtarbeit;

c) die übrigen für die Ausübung des Berufes erforderlichen Kosten; Artikel 34 Abs. 1 Bst. j bleibt vorbehalten;

d) ...

2. Die für die direkten Steuern zuständige Direktion (die Direktion) setzt für die Berufskosten nach Absatz 1 Bst. a-c Pauschalansätze fest; im Falle von Absatz 1 Bst. a und c steht der steuerpflichtigen Person der Nachweis höherer Kosten offen.

← Art. 26 DStG Gesetz über die direkten Kantonssteuern (DStG) - Gegenstand des Gesetzes Art. 28 DStG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

604 2023 100 · fr (Art. 27 Abs. 2 DStG)

Taxpayer Commuting Expense Deduction for Partial Private Vehicle Use

The reasoning on cantonal tax commuting deduction refers implicitly to this article which is the basis for the lack of a federal maximum deduction limit for cantonal tax.

604 2021 43 · fr (Art. 27 al. 1 let. c LICD)

Taxpayer Appeal Dismissed: Disallowed Professional and Property Deductions

This cantonal provision on deductible professional expenses was cited in the reasoning, supporting the rejection of the claim for cantonal tax purposes based on the lack of lucrative activity.

607 2016 33 · fr (Art. 27 DStG)

Taxpayer Meal Expense Deduction Appeal Dismissed for 2015

Cited as the equivalent legal provision for cantonal taxes regarding the deduction of professional costs.

604 2016 95 · fr (Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. d DStG)

Taxpayer Deduction for Specialist Business Management Course Upheld

The principles for cantonal tax regarding continuing education costs, which mirror the federal law, were applied to grant the appeal concerning cantonal tax.

604 2016 8 · fr (Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. d DStG)

Taxpayer LL.M. Costs Not Deductible as Continuing Education

This provision governs the deductibility of further training costs for employees under Cantonal tax law, which is the central issue decided upon in the cantonal tax matter.

604 2015 70 · fr (art. 27 al. 1 let. d LICD)

Attorney LL.M. Specialization Expenses Not Deductible as Initial Training Costs

This provision concerning deductible professional further training costs was cited in the reasoning leading to the rejection of the appeal regarding cantonal tax.

604 2014 97 · fr (art. 27 al. 1 let. d LICD)

Taxpayer Costs for Expert Finance Diploma Not Deductible as Initial Training

The court rejected the appeal, finding that the expenses did not qualify as deductible professional development expenses under this cantonal law provision (in its version applicable until December 31, 2015).

604 2014 66 · fr (Art. 27 al. 1 LICD)

Taxpayer Appeal of Default Tax Assessment and Limited Professional Expense Deduction Upheld Due to Late Filing and Insufficient Evidence

Cited as the cantonal provision governing the deductible professional expenses, which was the core subject of the dispute for cantonal tax.

607 2014 34 · fr (art. 27 al. 1 let. d LICD)

CAS Education Costs as Non-Deductible Foundational Training

This provision concerning the deductibility of professional development and retraining costs was applied in rejecting the appeal regarding cantonal tax.

607 2014 29 · fr (art. 27 al. 1 let. d LICD)

Taxpayer's EMBA Costs Classified as Non-Deductible Initial Training

Cited as part of the legal framework regarding deductible professional training and retraining costs for cantonal tax.