150.1
VRGCPJA
CH-FR
CH-FR
Art. 66 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Inhalt
Verfahren - Allgemeine Verfahrensvorschriften und erstinstanzliches Verfahren - Der Entscheid
Art. 66 VRG · Inhalt
1. Der Entscheid enthält folgende Angaben
a) die Bezeichnung der entscheidenden Behörde, im Fall einer kollegialen Verwaltungsjustizbehörde auch ihre Zusammensetzung;
b) die Namen der Parteien und ihrer Vertreter oder Beistände;
c) die Begründung;
d) die Entscheidformel;
e) das Datum und die Unterschrift;
f) die Rechtsmittelbelehrung, d. h. den Hinweis auf das zulässige ordentliche Rechtsmittel, die dafür zuständige Instanz und die einzuhaltende Frist.
2. Entscheide, die der Beschwerde an das Bundesgericht unterliegen, müssen den Anforderungen von Artikel 112 des Bundesgesetzes vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht entsprechen.
3. Das Kantonsgericht kann seine Urteile durch blosse Mitteilung der Entscheidformel abgeben. Es informiert die Parteien darüber, dass die Redaktion der gesamten Begründung innert 30 Tagen nach der Eröffnung verlangt werden kann.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
603 2024 103 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. f CPJA)
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Admissibility Review
Cited regarding the formal requirement for the administrative decision to indicate appeal remedies, which was missing.
605 2023 210 · fr (Art. 66 lit. a VRG)
Social Assistance Reduction Upheld Due to Failure to Pursue Subsidiarity Requirements
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the procedural requirement for decision composition, relevant to the rejection of procedural claims concerning Order I.
603 2024 27 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. c CPJA)
Appeal Dismissed: Upholding Dog Seizure and Five-Year Ownership Ban for Severe Animal Neglect
Cited in the context of the appellant's right to be heard (reasoning for the decision, not dispositive).
601 2023 61 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 Bst. e VRG)
Termination of Administrative Employee for Persistent Performance and Conduct Failures
Cited in the context of rejecting a formal objection regarding the lack of an original signature on the decision.
601 2023 61 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 Bst. f VRG)
Termination of Administrative Employee for Persistent Performance and Conduct Failures
Cited in the context of rejecting a formal objection regarding the lack of legal remedy instructions.
601 2017 152 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Appeal Against Residence Permit Refusal Upheld
The Cantonal costs rule implied by order III, although not explicitly cited in the operative part, the ruling itself (costs) is determined by cantonal law referenced throughout the section on costs (Art. 66 CPJA is the general rule for costs, which implies Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA for determination).
601 2017 152 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Appeal Against Residence Permit Refusal Upheld
This provision governs cantonal court costs, which are explicitly ordered in point III.
608 2016 125 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Claimant v. Health Insurer and Compensation Fund (Restitution Procedure Violation)
Cited alongside Art. 29 al. 2 Cst to establish the requirement for decisions to be motivated, which was raised in the context of the complainant's argument regarding insufficient motivation of the decision to lift the opposition.
603 2017 46 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Driving License Suspension for Traffic Violation
Cited in relation to the requirement for the authority to provide reasons, which was claimed to be violated by the appellant.
604 2016 79 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. e CPJA)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Protected Interest
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the formal requirements for the decision, but the appeal on this point was rejected.
604 2016 79 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. f CPJA)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Protected Interest
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the formal requirement for indicating legal remedies, but the appeal on this point was rejected.
602 2015 25 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Property Owners' Appeal Against Restoration Order for Unpermitted Agricultural Zone Structures Dismissed
Mentioned in the context of addressing a formal defect (missing date) in the initial decision, although the court ultimately found the appeal timely.
605 2014 34 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Against Social Assistance Suppression and Non-Disclosure of Indemnity Payments
Although discussed in the reasoning regarding the notification of the suspension, this article was not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.
604 2010 3 · fr (Art. 66 VRG)
Business Operator v. Municipality Regarding Automatic Machine Tax Assessment
The appellant argued that the municipal decision violated this article concerning the required content of a decision (lack of proper party designation and operative part).