Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 105 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Revision - Gründe

Verfahren - Besondere Verfahren
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (166 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 105 VRG · Gründe

1. Die Verwaltungsjustizbehörde zieht ihren Entscheid auf Gesuch in Revision, wenn eine Partei

a) neue erhebliche Tatsachen oder Beweismittel vorbringt oder

b) nachweist, dass die Behörde aktenkundige erhebliche Tatsachen übersehen hat, oder

c) nachweist, dass die Behörde die Bestimmungen über den Ausstand oder über das rechtliche Gehör verletzt hat.

2. Sie zieht ihren Entscheid ferner von Amtes wegen oder auf Antrag in Revision, wenn

a) ein Verbrechen oder ein Vergehen ihn beeinflusst hat oder

b) ein in derselben Sache ergangener Entscheid einer internationalen Justizbehörde dies erfordert, insbesondere ein Entscheid des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte.

3. Die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Gründe sind keine Revisionsgründe, wenn sie im Verfahren, das dem Entscheid vorausging, oder mit Beschwerde gegen diesen Entscheid hätten geltend gemacht werden können.

← Art. 104 VRG Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Gegenstand des Gesetzes Art. 106 VRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)

601 2020 111 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Deportation Appeal After Annulled Marriage
This article was cited in the reasoning to define the specific grounds for revision relevant to the reconsideration request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision sets the ground for the court to review its decision based on new facts or evidence, which the court ultimately found inapplicable to the request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision was used to exclude the revision because the alleged grounds could have been raised in the preceding procedure.
601 2020 86 · fr (Art. 105 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Immigration Permit Revocation and Improper Reconsideration Procedure
The revision application was rejected because it lacked new, relevant facts or evidence under this provision.
605 2019 201 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Rejection of Procedural Revision of Social Assistance Repayment Order Based on Acquittal
Although mentioned in the reasoning for admissibility checks, it is the basis for determining if a revision should proceed, specifically referencing its conditions (let. a and let. b).
605 2017 176 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Insurance Benefits Procedural Revision Rejected Due to Reinterpretation of Known Facts
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative court proceeds with the revision of its decision.
601 2019 150 · fr (art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Unemployment Insurance Subrogation and Employment Law Compensation Revision
The request for revision was declared inadmissible because the ground raised (change in jurisprudence) could have been invoked during the appeal procedure.
601 2019 146 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant v. Detention Facility (Civil Liability Compensation and Limitation Period)
Used as the primary basis for rejecting the revision request because the asserted grounds did not constitute new and important facts or evidence.
601 2017 64 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Son's Appeal for Swiss Family Reunification Denied Due to Adulthood
Cited to define the grounds under which a revision can be requested.
602 2018 68 · fr (art. 105 ss du code fribourgeois du 23 mai 1991 de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA; RSF 150.1))
Power Producer Turbine Replacement Permit Dispute
The petition was declared inadmissible because it did not meet the conditions for revision under these articles.
605 2018 185 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Revision Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
Cited as the relevant provision under which the request for procedural revision was interpreted.
605 2017 173 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant Seeks Procedural Revision Based on Reinterpreted Medical Evidence in Disability Claim
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative jurisdiction authority reviews its decision upon request.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
The rejection of the revision request is based on the examination of whether the criteria for revision (new important facts or means of proof) under this article were met.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
Although not explicitly used to reject the request, the court's reasoning implicitly relies on the scope defined by this article regarding the inadmissibility of grounds that could have been raised previously.
605 2016 257 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Insurance Benefits After Tick Bite Due to Improper New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for revision under cantonal law, but not in the final rejection order.