Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 254 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Zweite Abteilung: Die Verwandtschaft; Siebenter Titel: Die Entstehung des Kindesverhältnisses ; Erster Abschnitt: Allgemeine Bestimmungen ; B. ...
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 254 ZGB

← Art. 253 ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 255 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)

10/2002/13 · sh (Art. 254 Ziff. 1 ZGB)
Paternity Presumption Waiver and Cost Deposit Requirement
The court considered the scope of the official investigation principle in relation to the party's ability to waive evidence to rebut paternity.
10/2000/5 · sh (Art. 254 Ziff. 2 ZGB)
Paternity Challenge: Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and Inference from Refusal to Provide DNA Evidence
Cited as the directly applicable federal procedural provision establishing the mother's obligation to cooperate with evidence collection.
AA060038 · zh (Art. 254 Ziff. 2 ZGB)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Mootness of Blood Test Order
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the proportionality of the blood sampling, but not cited in the final operative orders.
11.1999.118 · ti (art. 254 n. 1 CC)
Paternity Contest Dismissal Cost Award Reversal Based on Just Motives
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of inquiry that governs paternity law, although its application is procedural/substantive context for the decision on costs.
11.1996.124 · ti (art. 254 n. 2 CC)
Paternity Suit After Foreign Judgment and Refusal of Serological Testing
Cited in the reasoning regarding the obligation of parties to cooperate with necessary examinations, concerning the appellant's refusal of the DNA test.
AA060038 · zh (Art. 254 Ziff. 2 ZGB)
Mootness in Legal Assistance Appeal: Cost Allocation Based on Likely Merits
Cited in the reasoning (§ III.1.4.1, 1.4.2) regarding the substantive issue of proportionality concerning the blood sample, which the court deemed inadmissible to review because it was only raised in the appeal.