Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Încheierea nr. 4182/2013 Gutgeheissen (Allowed) KI-strukturiert

Încheierea nr. 4182/2013 — Transfer of civil jurisdiction to a different district court upon request for change of venue

Geschäftsnummer Încheierea nr. 4182/2013 (ICCJ_99914)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Rechtsordnung Rumänien — Rechtsprechung (RO)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

The Supreme Court of Appeal and Justice dismissed the Public Prosecutor’s motion to reject the request and granted the plaintiff’s motion for a change of venue, transferring the civil case from the Dolj District Court, Second Civil Section, to the Sibiu District Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; this decision, which is final and non-appealable, resolved a procedural dispute concerning the judicial transfer of a case that had been subject to a prior, pending change-of-venue application at the same level; the ruling was based on the court's procedural authority to ensure impartial administration of justice by relocating the trial to a different jurisdiction, overriding the prosecutor's argument that the request was unfounded.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
The Supreme Court of Appeal and Justice dismissed the Public Prosecutor’s motion to reject the request and granted the plaintiff’s motion for a change of venue, transferring the civil case from the Dolj District Court, Second Civil Section, to the Sibiu District Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; this decision, which is final and non-appealable, resolved a procedural dispute concerning the judicial transfer of a case that had been subject to a prior, pending change-of-venue application at the same level; the ruling was based on the court's procedural authority to ensure impartial administration of justice by relocating the trial to a different jurisdiction, overriding the prosecutor's argument that the request was unfounded.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — Încheierea nr. 4182/2013

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 31960/215/2012 al Tribunalului Dolj, secția a II-a civilă, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată stabilit la data de 11 noiembrie 2013.

De asemenea, se referă că pe rolul instanței supreme a mai fost înregistrată o cerere de strămutare a aceluiași dosar sub număr 4477/1/2013 cu termen de judecată la data de 9 octombrie 2013 Completul CC3.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public formulează concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC V.R. SA privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 31960/215/2012 al Tribunalului Dolj, secția a II-a civilă.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Tribunalul Dolj, secția a II-a civilă la Tribunalul Sibiu.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 1 octombrie 2013.