Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
I 2024 58 • VG SZ I 2024 58 KI-strukturiert

I 2024 58 — Appeal of [Party A] v. [Party B]

Geschäftsnummer I 2024 58 (SZ_VG_003_I-2024-58_2025-04-10)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision involving a dispute between two parties, where the appellant was represented by one attorney and the appellee by another. The court reached its verdict on April 10, 2025, with a panel consisting of a Vice President and two Judges, and a Court Clerk. The specific details of the underlying factual situation and the reasoning for the final determination are not detailed in the provided excerpt, which only outlines the case identification, date, composition of the bench, and the parties involved in the appeal.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision involving a dispute between two parties, where the appellant was represented by one attorney and the appellee by another. The court reached its verdict on April 10, 2025, with a panel consisting of a Vice President and two Judges, and a Court Clerk. The specific details of the underlying factual situation and the reasoning for the final determination are not detailed in the provided excerpt, which only outlines the case identification, date, composition of the bench, and the parties involved in the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2024 58

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2024 58 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. April 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. D.________, |\n \n\n

\n