Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2024 13 • VG SZ I 2024 13 Abgewiesen (Dismissed) KI-strukturiert

I 2024 13 — Insurance Causation Dispute Affirming Rejection of Compensation Claim

Geschäftsnummer I 2024 13 (SZ_VG_003_I-2024-13_2024-06-10)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

The case involves a dispute over accident insurance causation where the appellant sought compensation for an alleged work-related accident. The court determined that the appellant failed to establish the necessary causal link between the reported event and the resulting health impairment, finding that the medical evidence did not sufficiently support the claim that the alleged work accident was the factual or a significant contributing cause of the current physical condition, thus affirming the lower authority's rejection of the claim.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG; Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG — Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG: The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible because it concerns a decision concerning the application of the Code of Social Insurance. Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG: The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.

Rechtsfragen & angewandte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-strukturiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible because it concerns a decision concerning the application of the Code of Social Insurance.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2024 13

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2024 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n