Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2023 79 • VG SZ I 2023 79 KI-strukturiert

I 2023 79 — Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Causal Link to Disability

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 79 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-79_2024-07-08)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

An individual appealed a decision concerning accident insurance benefits, where the core dispute involved the causal link between an alleged work accident and the resulting disability claim. The court reasoned that for a claim to be granted under accident insurance, the alleged harmful event must have demonstrably caused the asserted health impairment, and since the medical evidence failed to establish a necessary or even likely causal relationship between the reported incident and the claimant's ongoing physical complaints, the appeal against the prior rejection of benefits was ultimately dismissed.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG; Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG; Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG; Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG — Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury. Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link. Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.

Rechtsfragen & angewandte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-strukturiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury.

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link.

Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.

Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the respondent legal costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2023 79

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungsanspruch / Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: