Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2023 55 • VG SZ I 2023 55 KI-strukturiert

I 2023 55 — Appeal of Sickness Daily Allowance Denial Based on Stable Medical Assessment

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 55 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-55_2023-11-09)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

A claimant appealed a decision concerning sickness daily allowance insurance under mandatory health insurance law, where the lower court had dismissed the claim. The court reasoned that the claimant's continued claim for benefits after a prior medical assessment concluding no further disability was unfounded because the medical records did not show an objective deterioration or new circumstances warranting continued insurance payments beyond the established period.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
A claimant appealed a decision concerning sickness daily allowance insurance under mandatory health insurance law, where the lower court had dismissed the claim. The court reasoned that the claimant's continued claim for benefits after a prior medical assessment concluding no further disability was unfounded because the medical records did not show an objective deterioration or new circumstances warranting continued insurance payments beyond the established period.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2023 55

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Krankentaggeldversicherung nach KVG) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: