Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2023 33 • VG SZ I 2023 33 Abgewiesen (Dismissed) KI-strukturiert

I 2023 33 — Invalidity Pension Appeal Regarding Earning Capacity Threshold

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 33 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-33_2024-08-22)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

An appellant sought the award of an invalidity pension following the rejection of their claim by the social insurance authority, which determined that the appellant's reduced earning capacity in the relevant labor market was insufficient to meet the threshold for benefits. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the medical evidence, particularly concerning psychiatric conditions, did not establish a significant functional limitation preventing the appellant from engaging in substantial gainful employment in an adequately demanding occupation, thus affirming that the necessary degree of invalidity required for pension entitlement had not been met based on the expert assessments provided.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
An appellant sought the award of an invalidity pension following the rejection of their claim by the social insurance authority, which determined that the appellant's reduced earning capacity in the relevant labor market was insufficient to meet the threshold for benefits. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the medical evidence, particularly concerning psychiatric conditions, did not establish a significant functional limitation preventing the appellant from engaging in substantial gainful employment in an adequately demanding occupation, thus affirming that the necessary degree of invalidity required for pension entitlement had not been met based on the expert assessments provided.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2023 33

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: