Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2022 30 • VG SZ I 2022 30 Abgewiesen (Dismissed) KI-strukturiert

I 2022 30 — Survivor's Benefits Causation Dispute in Accident Insurance Claim

Geschäftsnummer I 2022 30 (SZ_VG_003_I-2022-30_2022-12-09)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

A claimant sought survivor's benefits under accident insurance following the death of an individual, disputing a prior decision that denied the claim based on a lack of established causation between the insured event and the subsequent death. The court reviewed the case concerning accident insurance and survivor's pension benefits, focusing on the causal link between the accident and the death, ultimately determining the outcome based on the required standard of proof for establishing such a relationship in the context of the relevant insurance law.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
A claimant sought survivor's benefits under accident insurance following the death of an individual, disputing a prior decision that denied the claim based on a lack of established causation between the insured event and the subsequent death. The court reviewed the case concerning accident insurance and survivor's pension benefits, focusing on the causal link between the accident and the death, ultimately determining the outcome based on the required standard of proof for establishing such a relationship in the context of the relevant insurance law.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2022 30

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. Z.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Kausalität; Hinterlassenenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: