Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
Gerichtsentscheide Legislation In Legislator analysieren
I 2022 25 • VG SZ I 2022 25 KI-strukturiert

I 2022 25 — Claimant v. Insurer Regarding Sickness Benefit Calculation Including Variable Compensation

Geschäftsnummer I 2022 25 (SZ_VG_003_I-2022-25_2022-10-17)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of daily sickness benefits following an accident, where the lower court determined the benefit based on the earnings prior to the accident, specifically excluding variable bonuses and commissions received in the preceding year. The court reasoned that for determining the average insured income under the relevant insurance law, only fixed salary components should be considered when the variable components are not guaranteed or are deemed speculative, thus upholding the lower court's calculation method which excluded the non-guaranteed fluctuating income elements.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of daily sickness benefits following an accident, where the lower court determined the benefit based on the earnings prior to the accident, specifically excluding variable bonuses and commissions received in the preceding year. The court reasoned that for determining the average insured income under the relevant insurance law, only fixed salary components should be considered when the variable components are not guaranteed or are deemed speculative, thus upholding the lower court's calculation method which excluded the non-guaranteed fluctuating income elements.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2022 25

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 25 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n D.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Taggeldberechnung) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: