Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
Gerichtsentscheide Legislation In Legislator analysieren
I 2021 56 • VG SZ I 2021 56 KI-strukturiert

I 2021 56 — Accident Insurance Causation Appeal

Geschäftsnummer I 2021 56 (SZ_VG_003_I-2021-56_2022-01-14)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

The case involves an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an alleged accident and the resulting injury. The appellant sought insurance benefits following an incident, which the administrative body responsible for accident insurance denied on the basis that the claimed injury was not causally related to the reported event. The court, in its decision, reviewed the evidence to determine whether the factual circumstances supported the conclusion that the accident directly caused the subsequent medical condition warranting insurance coverage.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
The case involves an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an alleged accident and the resulting injury. The appellant sought insurance benefits following an incident, which the administrative body responsible for accident insurance denied on the basis that the claimed injury was not causally related to the reported event. The court, in its decision, reviewed the evidence to determine whether the factual circumstances supported the conclusion that the accident directly caused the subsequent medical condition warranting insurance coverage.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2021 56

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 56 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: